Understanding e+e- --> W+W- Process Diagrams

  • Thread starter Thread starter davon806
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Process
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Feynman diagrams for the e+e- --> W+W- process in particle physics. The participants clarify that the s-channel is necessary for the electrons to produce W bosons, while the t-channel would require a different interaction setup. It is emphasized that certain vertices are allowed based on conservation laws, such as lepton number conservation, which restricts the types of particles that can interact at a vertex. The confusion about time flow in the diagrams and the role of neutrinos as force carriers is addressed, highlighting the importance of recognizing allowed interactions. Resources like textbooks and lecture notes are suggested for further clarification on these concepts.
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi there,
I am a very beginner in particle physics and now I'm struggling with this question.
Draw the lowest-order Feynman diagrams for e+e- --> W+W- process

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


There are 3 answers as follows:
31afc7e1-17c7-495e-9f92-248600d71349.jpg

Q1: 1st pic: Why did the gamma and Z take place in s -channel but not t -channel?
Q2: 2nd pic: Is there a reason why (e-) neutrino is the force carrier? Couldn't it be other entities like gamma or
Z or sth else?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 31afc7e1-17c7-495e-9f92-248600d71349.jpg
    31afc7e1-17c7-495e-9f92-248600d71349.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 1,036
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1: You need the electrons going in and the Ws coming out. You can only do that with the s-channel with a photon or Z. To have the t-channel, you'd need to turn the diagram sideways, which would correspond to, for example, an electron and W+ interacting to produce the positron and W-.

Q2: There are only certain allowed vertices. You can't have an electron, W, and photon at one vertex. That would violate conservation of lepton number, for one thing.

Do you have a textbook? There's probably a page showing diagrams of the allowed vertices.
 
vela said:
Q1: You need the electrons going in and the Ws coming out. You can only do that with the s-channel with a photon or Z. To have the t-channel, you'd need to turn the diagram sideways, which would correspond to, for example, an electron and W+ interacting to produce the positron and W-.

Q2: There are only certain allowed vertices. You can't have an electron, W, and photon at one vertex. That would violate conservation of lepton number, for one thing.

Do you have a textbook? There's probably a page showing diagrams of the allowed vertices.

I am just following my lecturer's note and he didn't say when we are going to use s or t-channel.I apologize but I'm really confused since this is my first course in particle physics, and I have no previous knowledge in QED so that a lot of course notes online are too difficult for me...:sorry:

I'd like to know, if time is flowing from left to right, in both s and t channels? (1st and 2nd pic)
To me, the only difference between 1st and 2nd pic is that:
1) e- doesn't physically touch e+ in 2nd pic
2) The exchange particle is different , but I don't know why the force carrier is a neutrino ( It could also be a neutrino in 1st pic)
3) You mentioned the conservation of lepton number, so according to 2nd diagram, we now have ve,e- and W- at the lower vertex. So Le = 1 + 1 = 2
At the upper vertex,Le = 1 - 1 = 0 ?
Let say if ve is replaced by a photon, then L is still different at both vertices ( -1 and 1) ?

Sorry...Please help:frown:
 
davon806 said:
I'd like to know, if time is flowing from left to right, in both s and t channels? (1st and 2nd pic)
Yes

To me, the only difference between 1st and 2nd pic is that:
1) e- doesn't physically touch e+ in 2nd pic
2) The exchange particle is different, but I don't know why the force carrier is a neutrino ( It could also be a neutrino in 1st pic)
3) You mentioned the conservation of lepton number, so according to 2nd diagram, we now have ve,e- and W- at the lower vertex. So Le = 1 + 1 = 2
At the upper vertex,Le = 1 - 1 = 0 ?
Let say if ve is replaced by a photon, then L is still different at both vertices ( -1 and 1) ?

Sorry...Please help:frown:
Like I said in my first reply, there are only certain allowed vertices. Unless you recognize that fact, these diagrams are going to seem random to you.

Take a look at http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~chpotter/particleandnuclearphysics/Lecture_05_FeynmanDiagrams.pdf. It may help you make sense of what's going on.
 
  • Like
Likes davon806
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top