Understanding Logarithm Functions: f(x) = log(100x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nesan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x) = log(100x) can be interpreted in two ways: as a vertical translation of the graph of log(x) up by 2 units, or as a compression toward the y-axis by a factor of 100. Both interpretations stem from the equivalence of log(100x) and log(x) + 2, but they represent different transformations. The compression affects the x-values, while the vertical translation affects the y-values. Ultimately, these two perspectives illustrate the same function through different transformations.
nesan
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
We're learning logarithms in school. I asked my teacher this question but she couldn't explain it very well.

For a function such as f(x) = log(100x), base ten of course.

When graphed I could say the graph is "compressed by a factor of 1 / 100"

or

Rewriting f(x) = log(100x) into f(x) = logx + log100 = logx + 2

Now it's f(x) = logx + 2

which is a vertical translation up two units. Why is it both? O.o

What do they have in relation? ]

Please and thank you, just want to understand this. >_<
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nesan said:
We're learning logarithms in school. I asked my teacher this question but she couldn't explain it very well.

For a function such as f(x) = log(100x), base ten of course.

When graphed I could say the graph is "compressed by a factor of 1 / 100"

or

Rewriting f(x) = log(100x) into f(x) = logx + log100 = logx + 2

Now it's f(x) = logx + 2

which is a vertical translation up two units. Why is it both? O.o

What do they have in relation? ]

Please and thank you, just want to understand this. >_<


It is not both: it is the same as the graph of log x but translated two units.

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio said:
It is not both: it is the same as the graph of log x but translated two units.

DonAntonio

Why is it the same?
 
I think you just showed why it's the same. Think of as the number 5. 4 + 1 = 5, 3 + 2 = 5, there can be two ways to write the same number, and in much the same way we can write some functions in multiple ways.
 
If you take any point (x, y) on the graph of y = log(x), you'll see that there is a point (x/100, y) on the graph of f(x) = log(100x), so one way of looking at the graph of f is that it represents a compression toward the y-axis of the graph of y = log(x) by a factor of 100.

On the other hand, the same point (x, y) on the graph of y = log(x) corresponds to the point (x, y + 2) on the graph of y = log(x) + 2, so this version of the function represents a translation up by 2 units.

Although log(100x) ##\equiv## log(x) + 2, we're looking at two different transformations, one in the horizontal direction, and one in the vertical direction. All we are doing is looking at one thing in two different ways.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top