Understanding Logic Comparators with Negative Feedback: Sam's Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding logic comparators and negative feedback in op-amps. Sam struggles to understand why, with 100% negative feedback, the output remains the same as the input, despite the theory suggesting that equal inputs lead to a zero output. Participants clarify that op-amps have very high gain, meaning even a tiny voltage difference can result in a significant output change, and feedback helps maintain stability by adjusting the output to minimize input voltage differences. They emphasize that in practical scenarios, the output will adjust to keep the inputs nearly equal, even if theoretically it seems unstable. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding feedback configurations to grasp the behavior of op-amps better.
samski
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
everyone loves these things but i can't get my head around it... any explanations seem to go from blindingly simple to technical very quickly... i understand logic comparators but as soon as negative feedback is included i get all confuzzled.

OK so i understand that the output will become G((V+)-(V-)). So if you use 100% negative feedback, i don't undertand why you will get the same output out as you put in... this is what i am referring to - http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/begin/opamp00.htm in the first part of the section "The Op-Amp As A Comparator - Analogue"

it says: "The only stable condition that can exist is if the + and - inputs are the same voltage."

however i was under the impression that if the + and - input are the same, the output is 0v because G*(x-x)=G*0=0. therefore this wouldn't be a stable input...

im also quite confused about limiting gain by using resistors and things but i guess ill understand that if i understand the basics...

i hope somebody can help...
thanks!

sam
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Op-amps have a very high gain 100,000x so even a small voltage across the inputs will bring the output to the highest available voltage from the power supply. Doesn't sound that useful unless using window comparators

With a gain of 100,000 what would have to be the voltage across inputs to produce output of 5 volts? , which is well below the power voltage for the IC.

Well simple, divide that and you get .000005 Volt across inputs to make 5V

Think about that? This is unrealistic.

So if some output is sampled back to the input, it's possible it can make a voltage difference between inputs 0.000005 volts or just call it 0, that depends on hundreds of different feedback configurations, you could study, but the general quick rule with feedbacks is

1. The output will do whatever is necessary to make the voltage across inputs zero. If it can't achieve that, the output will swing to positive or negative power supply.

This is from Horowithz Art of Electronics book, The Classic.

As an example, look at the simplest op-amp feedback circuit "the buffer"
You see output is directly hooked up to one input.

So if you apply voltage to the other input, output will do anything it can to to make the voltage difference between inputs zero. The only way it can do that is to swing to the actual input voltage.
 
Last edited:
hmm thanks that's a much better way of thinking of it. the thing that is still bugging me is that that doesn't follow output v = G(vplus-vneg)

o well... i'll have another look and see if it makes more sense now... :D
 
If you have a couple of hours on your hands, may I suggest that you take a look at these videos, the explanation is simply beautiful

PS there are two lecture about op-amps, the First one is about the basic theory and application, and the other one is about Positive feedback.
 
samski said:
it says: "The only stable condition that can exist is if the + and - inputs are the same voltage."

however i was under the impression that if the + and - input are the same, the output is 0v because G*(x-x)=G*0=0. therefore this wouldn't be a stable input...

You are right, in theory.

But suppose G = 100000 and V1 is at 10V.

Then V2 = 100,000(V1-V2)
V2 = V1 x (100000/100001) = 9.9999V

For most practical purposes, assuming that V2 = V1 is near enough.
 
thanks aleph... that's a good way of working it out :D

sorry abdo i couldn't see any links on your post so i couldn't watch the videos you were referring to...

anyway, that's cleared things up a bit...

thanks guys!


sam
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top