Understanding Negative Pressure and its Role in the Expansion of the Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Negative pressure is theorized to contribute to the universe's expansion by creating a form of repulsive gravity, though there is currently no conclusive evidence supporting the existence of repulsive gravity itself. Some discussions suggest that negative gravitational energy might balance other energies in the universe, leading to a total energy of zero; however, this is more a matter of calculation convention than a physical reality. The concept of dark energy, often associated with negative pressure, is recognized in general relativity and is believed to drive the acceleration of cosmic expansion. While there are indications that gravity behaves differently on large scales, these observations do not definitively prove the existence of repulsive gravity. Overall, the relationship between negative pressure and cosmic expansion remains an area of ongoing research and debate.
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
I read somewhere that negative pressure is responsible for repulsive gravity that is increasing the expansion of the universe. Can repulsive gravity exist? and if so how is it related to negative pressure?

I also heard that the negative gravitational energy compensates for all other energies in the universe making the total energy in the universe zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
Can repulsive gravity exist? and if so how is it related to negative pressure?
There is no evidence for repulsive gravity, there are possible measurements that suggest the normal law of gravity isn't quite right on large scales (gravity is weaker than it shoudl be) but nothing conclusive.

I also heard that the negative gravitational energy compensates for all other energies in the universe making the total energy in the universe zero.
This isn't 'negative gravity' it's just how you do the calculation. If you start with the mass in one point and lift the masses outward it's easier to make that energy negative, so when the mass is attracted back inward, that movement is postive - but it's purely a question of convention. It was once thought that the energy of the gravity expansion balanced the mass-energy of the rest if the universe - that isn't true.
 
mgb_phys said:
It was once thought that the energy of the gravity expansion balanced the mass-energy of the rest if the universe - that isn't true.

On what premise have we discredited this? Did we disprove this somehow?
 
mgb_phys said:
There is no evidence for [..]
It sounds like the OP is referring to dark energy which, if I understand correctly, can be represented as negative pressure in GR's source tensor, has a repulsive consequence of accelerating intergalactic expansion, and still figures prominently in the mainstream picture.
 
ok - I thought they mean the pioneer anomoly
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top