Understanding Solid Angle and its Relation to s=rθ

AI Thread Summary
Solid angle is defined as Omega=A/R^2, where A is the area on a sphere and R is the sphere's radius, making it dimensionless like radians. The relationship between arc length and radius in angle measurement is expressed as theta=s/R, establishing that the angle is independent of the circle's size. The use of R^2 in the solid angle formula reflects the proportionality of area to the square of the radius. Both definitions emphasize the mathematical nature of angles and solid angles, rather than any underlying physics. Understanding these relationships clarifies why solid angles are measured in steradians, similar to how angles are measured in radians.
hasanhabibul
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
why solid angle is A/r^2 ...why is this r^2...has it any similarity with s=rtheta??please help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are similar.
Angle is defined as theta=s/R, where s is an arc length and R the radius of a circle.
Solid angle is defined as Omega=A/R^2, where A is an area on a sphere and R is the radius of the sphere.
In each case, the angle and solid angle are dimensionless, but given the names radian and steradian for convenience.
If the surface is not on a sphere, then differential vectors must be used in the definition of solid angle.
 
why u r using r^2..it is just to make the whole thing dimestionless or any other physics in it..??
 
It does make solid angle dimensionless, but there are other reasons too.
Why divide s by R for radians? Because the arc length is proportional to R.
Dividing the arc length by R makes the angle measure in radians independent of the size of the circle. The same reasoning gives R^2 for steradians, because the area isl proportional to R^2. This is all simple mathematics, independent of any physics.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top