Understanding the Exponential Equation 2^(2x+y) = (4^x)(2^y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychStudent
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2^(2x+y) = (4^x)(2^y) holds true due to the properties of exponents. By substituting values for x and y, the equivalence can be verified, demonstrating that both sides yield the same result. The discussion highlights the rules of combining exponents, specifically x^a * x^b = x^(a+b) and x^(ab) = (x^a)^b. Understanding these rules clarifies why the initial equation is valid. This foundational knowledge is essential for solving similar exponential equations.
PsychStudent
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is 22x+y = 4x2y? If I substitute various digits into the x and y variables, it works, but I can't understand why. Can anyone please explain this to me?

For example, if we choose x=3 and y=1,
2(2)(3)+1 = 27 = 128
2(2)(3)+1 = 4321 = 64(2) = 128

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It follows from the basic rules of combining exponents.

x^a x^b = x^{(a+b)}

x^{ab} = (x^a)^b
 
I can't believe I didn't figure that out. Thank you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top