Understanding the mechanical advantage of a Pneumatic linkage system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the mechanical advantage equation for a pneumatic linkage system, specifically analyzing the relationship between the force at the wall and the force at the piston. The original equation indicates that wall force increases exponentially as the connecting rod nears the horizontal position, which is problematic. It is advised to avoid the horizontal position due to increased lateral forces and friction, which can lead to a "jammed" situation, complicating reverse movement. The mechanical advantage is linked to the relative velocities of the piston and the connecting rod, with optimal performance occurring when they are at a 90° angle. Modifications to the original derivation are suggested to address these issues.
DBTStud
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I need to derive an equation for the mechanical advantage between the piston force and the force at the wall. I need help to get the right answer
Hi all,

I need to derive an equation for the mechanical advantage between the force applied at the wall and the force at the piston for a linked system. I have attempted this but my equation suggests that the wall force increases expenantionally as the connecting rod approaches the horrizontal.

I've attached my derrivation. He fixed pivot of the bellcrank is ridgedly attached to the vertical piston cylinder. The module works to push the complete unit from the wall.

Please can you suggest any modifications where I might have went wrong

1000004654.jpg
1000004655.jpg
1000004656.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
DBTStud said:
... my equation suggests that the wall force increases exponentially as the connecting rod approaches the horizontal.
That is correct, reason for which the horizontal position of the connecting rod should be avoided.
Consider that the lateral force, and subsequent friction, on the piston-cylinder and stem-bushing would be also huge.
In some cases, a "jammed" situation takes place, making the reverse movement very difficult.

The mechanical advantage is proportional to the relative velocities of piston (point A) and point B (which reaches zero velocity when the connecting rod and piston stem are 90° apart).

Please, see:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/toggle-joint-d_2077.html

:cool:
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top