Understanding the Two Types of Density Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Liao Chen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm confused about the two density operators:

\rho=\sum_{i}\delta(r-r_{i}) and \rho=\sum_{i}|\psi_{i}>\rho_{ii}<\psi_{i}|

Is there anyone explaining this question to me? Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one is not normalized if your sum has more than one term.
 
arkajad said:
The first one is not normalized if your sum has more than one term.

Thanks a lot. Do you mean the two density operators are the same and connected through some transformations? Could you explain with a little more details?
 
After some thinking I really do not know what the first expression could mean. It does not make any sense to me. If I consider it as an operator, it would act as

(\rho\psi)(x&#039;)=\int \delta(x-x_i)\psi(x)dx=\sum_i\psi(x_i)

which is a number and not a function. For a continuous spectrum the formula should look like

(\rho\psi)(x&#039;)=\int \rho(x&#039;,x)\psi(x)dx

So, where did you get it from?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top