Uniform electric field interaction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field at the center of a square with positive and negative charges distributed along its sides. Participants emphasize the importance of using the electric field formula and considering the symmetry of the configuration. It is clarified that the electric field at the center is not zero, despite initial assumptions. A suggestion is made to analyze one side of the square and integrate the electric field contributions from all four sides. The conclusion is that the net electric field can be determined by summing the contributions while accounting for their directional vectors.
kvanr
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electric charge is distributed along each side of a square. Two adjacent sides have positive charge +Q on each, two sides have -Q on each.

What are the x and y components of the net electric field at the center of the square? (Each side has length "a").

Homework Equations


E=F/q ?
F=k*q1*q2/r^2
k=9E9Nm^2/C^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Trying to come up with a differential equation? I don't know how to begin with having 4 sides.
 

Attachments

  • problem.JPG
    problem.JPG
    8.1 KB · Views: 559
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the formula for the electric field from a charge (look in your book). Then argue from the special symmetry at the center of the square.
 
marcusl said:
You need the formula for the electric field from a charge (look in your book). Then argue from the special symmetry at the center of the square.

You mean the diagonal symmetry?

edit: Then that would make it equal 0 at the center?
I was thinking it was zero?
 
Last edited:
Well, pick a side (say the top) and integrate the field at the center as you move the source point along (left to right). Mentally summing the vectors (look at the symmetry) will show you the net direction even without doing the math. Now that you know the answer for one side, it's straightforward to add the contributions of other three.

Hint: the field is not 0 at the center.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top