Unitary in quantum field theory

shuijing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In QFT, which have infinite degree of freedom, there exlst infinite unitary nonequvilent representation. Expecially after phase transition, the two representation are unitary nonequvilent. So can we say that unitary are broken in QFT? Or a pure state can evolved to a mixed state which is a puzzle in black hole physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To make it clear there are two different types of unitary transformations here:

a. Given abstract commutation relations between configuration and momentum variables (or rather their exponentiated versions) there can be different representations as concrete operators on an concrete Hilbert space. Two such representations are physically equivalent if they can be related by a unitary transformation. For finite QM the the Stone-von Neuman theorem guarantees that all representations are physically equivalent...this answered the question do Schrodinger's equation and Heisenberg's matrix mechanics give the same answers. There is no such theorem for quantum theories with infinite degrees of freedom - i.e. for QFT. This can be understood as there being different `phases' (or sectors) that are physically different from each other just as one gets in the thermodynamical limit (taking infinite degrees of freedom limit) of statistical mechanical systems.

b. There is unitary evolution which guarantees conservation of probability in time - or the evolution that preserves pure states.
 
Last edited:
In statistical thermodynamics different phases are cut off from each other because it would take an infinite amount of energy to go from one to the other - but is this the kind of idea you are getting at - a change in phase with evolution?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the response. I listened to a talk given by Wald about information paradox. His idea is that a pure state envoled into a mixed state doesn't break the unitary. I think that maybe in QFT this idea is better understandable.
The formation of black hole is just a phase transition which evolve from a pure state to a mixed state.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
87
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
182
Views
14K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Back
Top