Unveiling the Mysteries of Photon Helicity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usaf Moji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity Photon
Click For Summary
Photon helicity is defined as the projection of a photon's spin along its direction of motion, resulting in values of ±ħ, despite the total spin magnitude being √2ħ. The spin vector of a photon is always aligned with its momentum vector, which leads to this helicity constraint. A zero helicity state would imply a non-zero rest mass for the photon, contradicting its massless nature. Relativity rules out zero spin projection for massless particles, as they must always travel at the speed of light. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between spin, helicity, and the fundamental properties of photons.
Usaf Moji
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I'm perplexed about something that Wikipedia says about photon helicity:

The magnitude of its spin is \sqrt{2} \hbar and the component measured along its direction of motion, its helicity, must be \pm\hbar.

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon)

But for a photon, doesn't the spin vector always point in the same direction as the momentum vector - and therefore, shouldn't the magnitude of a photon's helicity equal it's spin magnitude, i.e. \sqrt{2} \hbar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spin vector is always at an angle to the propagation vector, such that its component in the direction of propagation is \pm \hbar and its magnitude is \sqrt{s(s+1)}\hbar = \sqrt{2}\hbar.

In theory, one might expect that the photon could also have a spin projection of zero. However, apparently this would require that the photon have non-zero rest mass (which it doesn't), so a zero helicity state is not observed.

If somebody can explain why a zero spin projection is ruled out by relativity in more detail, I would be grateful.
 
Last edited:
Usaf Moji: WHY must the spin of the photon be aligned in the same direction as its momentum-vector?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K