UP regarding value of a field and its rate of change

Suwailem
Gold Member
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am just a hobbyist and try to learn for myself.

I understand that the value of a field and its rate of change play the same role of position and momentum of a particle with respect to Uncertainty Principle, i.e. both pairs are conjugate variables. My question is: does the rate of change of a field extends to the negative domain, so that it could take negative values, or is it always non-negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Derivative of a field can be negative and it often is negative. If it were always positive (or zero), the field value would be always and forever growing (or not changing).
 
Thank you mvp_plate.
 
If the momentum is always positive (or non-negative), then the analogy of momentum with rate of change will not be one to one?
 
Suwailem said:
If the momentum is always positive (or non-negative), then the analogy of momentum with rate of change will not be one to one?

Momentum is not always non-negative. Consider two bodies of equal mass moving in opposite directions: their momenta will be of equal magnitude but opposite sign, so the total momentum of the system is zero.
 
Nugatory said:
Momentum is not always non-negative. Consider two bodies of equal mass moving in opposite directions: their momenta will be of equal magnitude but opposite sign, so the total momentum of the system is zero.

Thank you Nugatory.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top