Using Four vectors & Special Relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating energy, velocity, momentum, and invariant quantities in the context of special relativity. In part (a), the user confirms the energy of the incoming particle as 3 MeV and seeks clarification on calculating velocity and gamma, with initial calculations suggesting momentum as 2√2 MeV/c. For part (b), the user questions whether energy and momentum are the only conserved quantities or if the invariant of energy and momentum should be considered. In part (c), the user correctly identifies the total energy as the sum of the incoming energy and the stationary particle's rest energy, while also determining momentum from part (a). The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations and understanding conservation laws in relativistic physics.
Sekonda
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hey,

My question concerns parts (a), (b) and (c) in the below.

tmst2.png


In part (a) we're asked to find the energy, velocity and momentum of the incoming particle AND then to find gamma, however I know the energy of the incoming particle is simply 3MeV but I'm not sure how to find the velocity without finding gamma first? I'm not sure whether this matters but I found E=3MeV, p=2√2 MeV/c and v=2c/3*√2... Is this right? and γ=3

Part (b) asks which quantities are conserved - surely this is just energy and momentum? Or is the invariant of energy and momentum?

Part (c) asks to compute the invariant of the system - I'm guessing 'E' is just the total energy i.e. sum of incoming with rest of stationary and 'p' is the momentum determined in part (a)

Thanks for any help/confirmation on answers,
SK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a) it looks like you got it right.

For part b) you could work it out explicitly to check what the correct answer is.

For part c) yes, you are right.
 
Cheers man, I guess your suggestion for part (b) would make sense...

I'll do that now,
Thanks,
SK
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top