MHB Using line equations to calculate a difference in rates of development

  • Thread starter Thread starter jakerm1995
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using two linear equations to compare the development rates of a species at different temperatures, specifically 25°C and 33°C. The equations indicate that at 25°C, development occurs at a rate of 0.7479 hours of development per real hour, while at 33°C, the rate is 1.050 hours per real hour. The confusion arises from calculating percentage increases, which are not applicable for linear equations due to their non-constant nature. Instead, the correct approach is to compare the slopes of the equations, revealing that development at 33°C is approximately 1.404 times faster than at 25°C. Understanding the significance of the slopes clarifies the difference in growth rates between the two temperatures.
jakerm1995
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have two line equations representing two temperatures:

Temperature 25C: y= 0.7479x + 0.6586
Temperature 33C: y= 1.050x + 1.601

I am tasked with using these to work out the difference in development rates of a particular species under each temperature. Y= development time and x=Time. I am confused with how to use these two equations to calculate the difference in growth rate. As when I apply a percentage increase calculation to temperature 33, I calculate an 87% increase over 10 hours, and with the 25C i see a 92% increase over 10 hours. It should be that the 33C has a higher development rate and so my calculations must be wrong :/ I am very confused. I will post the graph here so you can understand better. Any suggestions are much appreciated (bare in mind, I am a noob at maths).

1645659652965.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jakerm1995 said:
Temperature 25C: y= 0.7479x + 0.6586
Temperature 33C: y= 1.050x + 1.601
These are linear equations (i.e. they look like straight lines on the graph). The first one can be interpreted as "at 25°C every hour of real time increases developmental age by 0.7479 hours".

Percentage increases for linear equations are not constant so we can't use these, instead we can compare them by using the slope of the line, which is the coefficient of x in these equations (0.7479 development hours per hour at 25°C and 1.050 development hours per hour at 33°C). We can say that the development rate at 33°C is ## \frac{1.050}{0.7479} \approx 1.404 ## times that at 25°C,
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top