Using two duct silencers in series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Using two duct silencers in series does not guarantee a cumulative 20 dB reduction in sound, as sound can travel around the silencers and through other paths. Real-world scenarios often involve additional noise sources, such as duct radiation or flow noise, which can affect overall sound levels. A practical example highlighted a situation where adding a second enclosure did not reduce noise as expected due to sound escaping through the floor. If the primary noise source is effectively managed, two 10 dB silencers could achieve the desired reduction. Ultimately, the effectiveness of using two silencers depends on the specific sound environment and any alternative noise pathways present.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
Consider a straight duct silencer of any sort. If you place two of them in series, how will that affect the sound? If one silencer results in a 10 dB reduction for a specific frequency, will using two result in 20? It just seems like too much of an easy answer so I thought I would check with people here :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are correct, it's too much of an easy answer. If there are no other sound travel paths, yes. In the real world, however, things are different because sound also travels around the silencer.

I once worked on a machine that was extremely noisy. With a normal (for that company) noise enclosure the sound was about 105 dB. I said to put the machine on vibration isolators, another engineer said to add a second noise enclosure around the first one. I was new there, he was well connected with management, so they built a second noise enclosure over the first. When they measured the noise level at 105 dB, they called me back. Standing ten feet from the machine, I pointed the meter at the machine and measured 105 dB, pointed the meter away from the machine and measured 105 dB, pointed the meter down toward the floor and measured 107 dB. The noise was going under the noise enclosure through the concrete floor. They put in the vibration isolators and got the machine down to the 80 dB called for in the contract.

If the silencer is improved enough, the primary noise source will be something else. It could be noise radiated from the duct, it could be from the fan inlet or outlet, it could be flow noise after the silencer. On the other hand, if the other noise sources are small enough compared the duct noise, then two 10 dB silencers in series will result in 20 dB reduction.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and russ_watters
jrmichler said:
You are correct, it's too much of an easy answer. If there are no other sound travel paths, yes. In the real world, however, things are different because sound also travels around the silencer.

In this case there actually shouldn't be any other path available. The machinery sits in a room which has a wall that also has it's requirements regarding sound transfer. The only open path through the wall is the duct on which I plan to install the silencer(s).
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top