Valid Observer Point of View: Exploring Time From the Smallest Particles

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of each object in the universe being considered as a frame of reference or observer, and the use of terminology such as "frame of reference" and "measurement" in the context of general relativity and quantum mechanics. The speaker also clarifies that there is no problem with considering every object as an observer and emphasizes the importance of understanding fundamental concepts.
  • #1
lnsanity
34
0
Can I consider each particle as there own observer with there own personal experience of time say each quark or each electron ? Because I read that every observer is as valid as any. I know that general relativity is a theory applied to the very big and here I am asking question for the very small sorry if I on the verge of breaking down the theory I promise I won't do that again! I thought it was a theory of gravity and I thought if there is a size or type of object I can't consider as an observer than it is a contradiction with Einstein theory...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
lnsanity said:
Can I consider each particle as there own observer with there own personal experience of time say each quark or each electron ? Because I read that every observer is as valid as any. I know that general relativity is a theory applied to the very big and here I am asking question for the very small sorry if I on the verge of breaking down the theory I promise I won't do that again! I thought it was a theory of gravity and I thought if there is a size or type of object I can't consider as an observer than it is a contradiction with Einstein theory...
Yes, each object in the universe can be taken as a Frame of Reference, but I don't get why you think this could be any kind of problem.

And, just on general principles, if you come across something that you think is contradictory to GR, assume you have misunderstood.
 
  • #3
I think maybe the answer is that the word "observer" as a term has kind of been replaced in relativity with "frame of reference" or "coordinate system", in order to remove the possible confusion that there needs to be someone doing the observing... kind of like on the quantum side where "observation" has been kind of replaced by "measurement" and that looks like that is being further replaced by "decoherence", in order to also remove any confusion about there having to be someone observing.

I wonder if it is correct to say relativity is good all the way down except at zero, and QM is good all the way up to infinity?
 
  • #4
No I don't think it is problem I am just building up my knowledge foundation making sure I am not wrong with the fundamental.
And yes frame of reference is a better word than observer to describe the experience.
 
  • #5
lnsanity said:
No I don't think it is problem I am just building up my knowledge foundation making sure I am not wrong with the fundamental.
And yes frame of reference is a better word than observer to describe the experience.
Just FYI, on terminology, the term "observer" is more correctly stated as "measurement" and is not at all the same as a Frame of Reference.
 

FAQ: Valid Observer Point of View: Exploring Time From the Smallest Particles

What is the Valid Observer Point of View?

The Valid Observer Point of View is a scientific concept that acknowledges the importance of perspective in understanding time and the universe. It suggests that there is no singular "correct" viewpoint, but rather multiple valid perspectives that can provide insight into the nature of time.

How does exploring time from the smallest particles help understand the Valid Observer Point of View?

By examining time at the smallest levels, such as the behavior of subatomic particles, we can better understand the fundamental principles that govern the universe. This can provide insights into how time functions and how different perspectives can contribute to our understanding of it.

What role does the concept of relativity play in the Valid Observer Point of View?

The concept of relativity, which states that measurements of time and space are relative to the observer's perspective, is essential to the Valid Observer Point of View. It emphasizes the importance of considering different viewpoints and how they can influence our understanding of time.

How does the Valid Observer Point of View relate to the concept of time dilation?

Time dilation, which is the difference in the passage of time between two observers in different frames of reference, is a crucial aspect of the Valid Observer Point of View. It highlights the idea that time is not absolute and can vary based on the observer's perspective.

What are the potential implications of the Valid Observer Point of View for our understanding of time?

The Valid Observer Point of View challenges the traditional notion of time as a linear, unchanging concept. It suggests that time can be perceived and experienced differently by different observers, and this could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and our place in it.

Similar threads

B Further Understanding Simultaneity Conventions
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
B How do Black Holes Grow? A Far-Away Observer's Perspective
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
I What causes an accelerated clock to record less events
Replies
8
Views
613
I Double Pulsar: 16 Year Study Validates Relativity
Replies
1
Views
991
I An observer passing the event horizon of a black hole
Replies
12
Views
4K
I Coordinate Transformation versus Change of Synchrony Convention
Replies
9
Views
675
B My paraphrased explanation of the Twin Paradox
Replies
24
Views
2K
B Time dilation and Einstein's theorem
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
I Exploring Gravitational Particles/Waves: Interference & Shadows
Replies
2
Views
996
I Time Dilation Paradoxes Near C: Exploring the Twin Paradox of Special Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top