A Value of quintessence while studying black hole thermodynamics

djymndl07
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
It is often seen in research papers that values of quintessence state parameter $\omega$ is taken between -1 and -1/3. However $\omega=-1$ corresponds to the cosmological constant and -1/3 corresponds to dust phase. Why these two cases are excluded in studying BH extended phase space thermodynamics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\omega = -1## corresponds to a cosmological constant, with de Sitter (exponential) expansion. ##-1 < \omega < -1/3## corresponds to quintessence-like stress energy -- these models have null singularities (i.e. genuine past singularities), whereas de Sitter models have regular null surfaces that can be smoothly extended (i.e. they can exist eternally into the past). ##w = -1/3## corresponds to inertial expansion. As you can see, different ##\omega## leads to different causal structures.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Back
Top