I Variation of Four-Velocity Vector w/ Respect to Metric Tensor

Hubble_92
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! I'm having some difficulty showing that the variation of the four-velocity,

Uμ=dxμ/dτ

with respect the metric tensor gαβ is

δUμ=1/2 UμδgαβUαUβ

Does anyone have any suggestion?

Cheers,
Rafael.

PD: Thanks in advances for your answers; this is my first post! I think ill be active sharing and discussing in other Physics/ Astrophysics topics ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hubble_92 said:
Hi everyone! [...] PD: Thanks in advances for your answers; this is my first post! I think ill be active sharing and discussing in other Physics/ Astrophysics topics ;)
Just a suggestion for the future. Please, use the LaTex code. This website has MathJax implemented, so that the equations are made to look great. Just search here for a tutorial on how to write with the simple code.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn, vanhees71 and Hubble_92
First prove that
\delta g^{\alpha\beta}U_{\alpha}U_{\beta} = 2 U_{\mu}\delta U^{\mu}. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1) Then, using U_{\mu}U^{\mu} = 1, you can write the left-hand-side of (1) as
\delta g^{\alpha \beta}U_{\alpha}U_{\beta} \equiv 2 U_{\mu} \left( \frac{1}{2}U^{\mu} \delta g^{\alpha \beta}U_{\alpha}U_{\beta}\right) . \ \ \ \ \ (2)
The result follows by comparing (1) with (2).
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak, vanhees71, PeroK and 1 other person
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top