Vector and Parametric equations, i

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining vector and parametric equations for various lines based on given points and direction vectors. It emphasizes the distinction between points and vectors, explaining how vectors can be used to represent movements in the plane. The conversation provides methods for converting scalar equations into vector forms and highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between direction vectors and line equations. Additionally, it discusses the concept of position vectors and how they can be utilized to derive parametric equations. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the foundational concepts necessary for solving the posed problems.
kathialopez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Determine vector and parametric equations for the line through the point A(2, 5) with direction vector = (1, −3).

2.Determine parametric equations for the line through (-2, 3) and parallel to the line with vector equation = (−2, 1) + t(6, 4).

3.Find vector and parametric equations for the line with equation 2x + y + 3 = 0.

4.Determine parametric equations for the line with scalar equation 4x – y + 5 = 0.

5. A line passes through the point (1, -4) and is perpendicular to the line 3x + 2y – 6 = 0. Determine a scalar equation for the line.


I need extreme help wiht all of these questions. i understand nothing in this unit and I am teaching myself :|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what don't you understand about vector and parametric equations? Maybe we can help you understand them.
 
As far as understanding what's going on is concerned, I teach my students that vectors in the plane represent actions on points... the vector V = <a,b> moves the point (x,y) to the point (x',y') = (x+a,y+b).

Thinking of them this way we then understand
a.) that vectors and points are distinct types of mathematical objects,
b.) how to add vectors (compose actions),
c.) why vectors can be placed anywhere on the plane (choosing which point to move).

Note the use of angle brackets to distinguish points and vectors.

Then we define specifically a position vector as the vector associated with a point which moves the origin to that point (and so will have the same numerical components).

Getting the above clear first one can then get a little sloppy and "identify" position vectors with the points they indicate (while in the back of one's mind keeping clear that this is dependent on a choice of origin point.) You can then drop the angle bracket notation for vectors if you like, but it is good practice to keep it up.

OK, now a line is a set of points and you can indicate it by giving a relation for the coordinates e.g. the points (x,y) such that ax+by = c.

Given a point (e.g. p=(2,5) and a direction vector v=<1,-3> ) you can indicate all other points by the fact that you can reach them by starting at p and moving in the direction of v by some amount. (say t times v's length).

Just so we work only with vectors, let's instead start at the origin (0,0) then move to p using its position vector (e.g. <2,5> ) and then move off in the v direction by t times its length. The composite action is then: <2,5> + t <1,-3> = <2,5> + <t,-3t> = <2+t,5-3t>.

Acting on the origin gives you the point (2+t, 5-3t). And that is your parametric form:
(x,y) such that x=2+t, y=5-3t.

That will help you with 1.) and you should be able to handle 2.) using the same techniques.

Now here's a handy bit of info when you're given a linear equation: ax + by = c.
Letting \vec{r}=\langle x,y \rangle be the position vector for the point (x,y), and then considering the vector \langle a, b\rangle with components corresponding to coefficients of the linear equation you can rewrite the equations in vector form as:
\langle a,b\rangle\bullet \langle x,y\rangle = c where \bullet is the dot product.

Now consider some direction vector for this line, say \vec{v}. Remember how I said to think of vectors as actions moving points. The direction vector moves points on the line to other points on the line. Let \vec{v} = \langle h,k\rangle, where h is a change in x, and k is a change in y coordinates. Since this point is still on the line it still satisfies the equation for the line and so:
\langle a,b \rangle \bullet( \langle x,y \rangle + \langle h,k \rangle) = c
but since the original equation is also true this means:
\langle a,b \rangle \bullet \langle h , k \rangle = 0
In short the vector \langle a,b\rangle must be perpendicular to the direction of the line.

This fact is a tool for solving 3.) through 5.).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K