Velocity of a Sphere Rolling in a Circular Bowl

AI Thread Summary
A solid sphere of mass M and radius a rolls down a circular bowl from a height R, and the problem involves finding the velocity of its center of mass at the bottom. The total energy at the top is converted into translational and rotational kinetic energy at the bottom, leading to the equation E_T = mg(R-a) = (1/2)mv^2 + (7/10)ma^2(v^2/r^2). The incorrect expression for velocity derived was v = √(5g(R-a)/6), but the correct expression is v = √(10(R-a)/7). The confusion arose from double-counting the linear kinetic energy, which was clarified by considering the sphere's motion either as linear speed plus rotation about its center or as rotation about the contact point. Understanding this distinction helped resolve the issue effectively.
CoffeeCrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solid sphere of mass M and radius a is released at vertical height y=R and rolls down a circular bowl without slipping, find an expression for the velocity of the sphere's center of mass at the bottom of the bowl.

2. Homework Equations


##I=I_c+Md^2##
I=\frac {2} {5} Ma^2
##U=Mgh##
E_r=\frac {1} {2}I\omega^2
E_t=\frac {1} {2}mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The sphere is released from height R, so it's total energy is given by E=mg(R-a) (as the radius of the sphere is non-negligible).
Taking the bottom of the bowl to be the zero of potential energy;


##E_T=mg(R-a)=\frac {1} {2} I\omega^2+\frac {1} {2}mv^2##

At the bottom of the bowl, all gravitational potential energy will have been transformed into translational and rotational kinetic energy.
As the sphere is in rotation around it's contact point, via the parallel axis theorem:
I=I_c+Md^2
## I=\frac {2} {5} Ma^2+Ma^2##
## I=\frac {7} {5} Ma^2 ##


And as ## \omega^2=\frac {v^2} {r^2}, ##

## E_T=mg(R-a)=\frac {1} {2}mv^2+\frac {7} {10} ma^2 (\frac {v^2} {r^2}) ##

Following this through I come up with ##v=\sqrt{\frac {5g(R-a)}{6}}##

Rather than the (correct), ##v=\sqrt{\frac {10(R-a)}{7}}##

I know if I only count the rotational kinetic energy I end up with this expression, but I don't understand why I wouldn't also count the translational kinetic energy?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I accidentally hit enter half way through writing this
 
You've effectively counted the linear KE twice. Either take the sphere's motion as a linear horizontal speed of its mass centre, plus a rotation about the mass centre, or take it as a rotation about the point of contact with the bowl.
 
  • Like
Likes CoffeeCrow
Thank you so much! I think I understand a lot better now (that was a lot more painless than expected).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top