B Velocity of the tip of a 2m pole hitting the ground

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dc2LightTech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Pole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of the tip of a 2m pole when it falls to the ground, with considerations for a 10kg weight on top. Participants question whether the pole falls from a vertical position or from a greater height. The need for more details about the scenario is emphasized to provide an accurate calculation. The thread is temporarily closed for moderation pending further clarification from the original poster. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in physics calculations related to falling objects.
Dc2LightTech
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
what would be the velocity of the tip of a 2m pole that started from a vertical position to hitting the ground. what would be the velocity of a 10Kg weight was on the top?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do ... do we assume the pole just sort of falls over? Like from an initial height of 0m? Or is it falling from a mile?

I feel like this question needs a bit more detail.
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

@Dc2LightTech -- Please send me a Personal Message (PM*) to let me know if this question is for schoolwork and what you know about how to calculate this. Depending on that PM, we can try to move/unlock this thread. Thank you.

*(click on my avatar and Start a Conversation)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top