Verify Eigenstates: Solving s_i & m_i Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Land
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying eigenstates by solving the equations involving spin quantum numbers, specifically s_i and m_i. The equation presented relates to the calculation of eigenvalues for a system of two spin-1/2 particles. It clarifies that for spin-1/2 particles, both s_1 and s_2 equal 1/2, with m values corresponding to +1/2 for the spin-up state and -1/2 for the spin-down state. The clarification helps address confusion regarding the definitions of s_i and m_i in the context of angular momentum. Overall, the thread provides essential insights into the quantum mechanical treatment of spin states.
Philip Land
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
verify that ##|s=1,m_s=0> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow \downarrow> + |\downarrow \uparrow >## is an eigenstate of ##\hat{S^2}##
Relevant Equations
(Drop hats) $$S^2 = S_1^2 + S_2^2 + 2S_{1z}S_{2z} + S_{1+}S_{2-}+S_{1-}S_{2+}$$
I simply use the equation above, and the eigenvalus whish yield:
##\hbar^2 [ s_1(s_1+1) + s_2(s_2+1) + m_1m_2 + \sqrt{s_1(s_1+1) - m_1(m_1+1)}\sqrt{s_2(s_2+1) - m_2(m_2-1)} + \sqrt{s_2(s_2+1) - m_2(m_2+1)}\sqrt{s_1(s_1+1) - m_1(m_1-1)}##

Very straight forward. My issue is that I don't know what ##s_i## and ##m_i## for i=1,2 is? I only have "s" and "m" from the definition in the question.

I recently had the same problem in an exercise but with angular momentum. Please bring me some clarity on this, thanks so much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Single-particle states ##|\uparrow\rangle## and ##|\downarrow\rangle## are a basis for spin-1/2 particles, therefore ##s_1 = s_2 = 1/2## and, by convention, ##|\uparrow\rangle## corresponds to ##m= +1/2## and, conversely, ##|\downarrow\rangle## to ##m= -1/2##.
 
DrClaude said:
Single-particle states ##|\uparrow\rangle## and ##|\downarrow\rangle## are a basis for spin-1/2 particles, therefore ##s_1 = s_2 = 1/2## and, by convention, ##|\uparrow\rangle## corresponds to ##m= +1/2## and, conversely, ##|\downarrow\rangle## to ##m= -1/2##.
I see, thanks for clearing this up!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top