Verifying Electric Field of Charged Rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the electric field equation for a charged rod, specifically using the formula kq/(d(d+L)). There is a concern about the expression not being a complete equation and the need for clarity on what the variables represent. Participants suggest that integration might be necessary to derive the correct equation for the electric field. There is also a mention of the distance variable 'd' and its implications for the calculation. Ultimately, the original poster resolves their issue and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.
hoseA
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/2646/chargedrod1ew.png

I used the equation:

kq/(d(d+L))

I converted everything to meters before doing the calculations. (I'm kind of pressed for time at the moment... i'll post the actual work in 2 hours.)

I want to make sure the equation is right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. An equation must contain an equality. What you've written is an expression. What is it an expression for ? And what do the variables represent ?

2. Have you learned integration ? If you have, I suspect you are required to derive the equation (it's just a 4-line derivation) for the field and substitute the values.

3. Assuming d is the distance to the center of the rod, that is not the equation I get for the field.
 
Gokul43201 said:
1. An equation must contain an equality. What you've written is an expression. What is it an expression for ? And what do the variables represent ?

2. Have you learned integration ? If you have, I suspect you are required to derive the equation (it's just a 4-line derivation) for the field and substitute the values.

3. Assuming d is the distance to the center of the rod, that is not the equation I get for the field.

any more hints? i have to submit my homework in 20 min. :frown:
 
Nevermind. i got it. Thanks for the help Gokul.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top