Verifying Math Problem: Can You Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Logistics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying the solution to a math problem involving a series and its radius of convergence. Participants confirm that the radius of convergence is infinite, but note that the series does not converge for every possible value of "x." The original poster's work is deemed correct, although they missed the k=0 term, which does not impact convergence. The series is identified as a Bessel function of the first kind, relating to a specific differential equation. Overall, the consensus is that the calculations are accurate and the radius of convergence is indeed infinite.
Logistics
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't converge for every possible "x",as your "radius of convergence =infinite" might mean.

\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{k}\frac{x^{2k}}{4^{k}(k!)^{2}} =-\frac{x^{2}}{4}\ _{2}F_{1} \left(1,2,2;-\frac{x^{2}}{4}\right)


Daniel.
 
To simplify
there was no need to take the x's ...take x^2=w and just take the limit of the ratio's..

As per my knowledge it seems to me R is infinite
 
Well,try x=60.How big is the number...?

Daniel.
 
Thanks for the replies guys.

I have left it as R = infinity; seems the rest of the class got the same thing. So I'll just leave it at that
 
dextercioby said:
It doesn't converge for every possible "x",as your "radius of convergence =infinite" might mean.

\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{k}\frac{x^{2k}}{4^{k}(k!)^{2}} =-\frac{x^{2}}{4}\ _{2}F_{1} \left(1,2,2;-\frac{x^{2}}{4}\right)

You've missed the k=0 term, though this doesn't affect convergence. The OP's work is fine.

For interests sake, this thing is a Bessel function of the first kind (it's a solution to the d.e. xy''+y'+xy=0).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top