Voltage and Electro Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating electric potential and electric potential energy in two scenarios involving charged particles. In the first scenario, a positively charged particle moves between points A (441 V), B, and C (805 V), with the goal of determining the potential at B, using the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy. The second scenario involves calculating the electric potential energy of four identical charges placed in a line, where the cumulative effects of each charge on the others must be considered. Participants express confusion about the relationships between potential, velocity, and energy, particularly how to account for the contributions of multiple charges in the second problem. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding potential differences and the role of reference points in electric potential calculations.
himura137
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1) The potential at location A is 441 V. A positively charged particle is released there from rest and arrives at location B with a speed vB. The potential at location C is 805 V, and when released from rest from this spot, the particle arrives at B with twice the speed it previously had, or 2 vB. Find the potential at B.

for this, i place the drawing as
A B C
and i am assuming that A + C = B, i am not sure if that's correct or not and i just added the 2 different potential. But then the Vb and 2Vb isn't used and I am not sure where its used unless its telling me that the distance between A and B is half of B and C.


2) Four identical charges (+1.6 μC each) are brought from infinity and fixed to a straight line. Each charge is 0.36 m from the next. Determine the electric potential energy of this group.


i placed the charges as follow
q1 q2 q 3 q4
and used q1 as the starting point so EPE = 0
then i used the equation V = Kq/r and multiple the V by (1.6 micro columb) to get the EPE. I did that for q2 q3 q4 and changing r as i get closer to q4. Then i added all the EPE together but i am missing something.

EPE of q1 = 0
EPE of q2
(q1)(k)/(.36m) = V
EPE2 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

EPE of q3
(q1)(k)/(.36m x 2) = V
EPE3 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

EPE of q4
(q1)(k)/(.36m x 4) = V
EPE4 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

Add EPE (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) = Total EPE of the group
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part a, the potential is measured with respect to some other point, e.g. ground. The particle is at rest at B, so not kinetic energy, then arrives at A or C with some velocity, and a kinetic energy of mv2, and the energy imparted to the particle comes from the electrical field, and the energy is charge (q) * voltage (V) = qV. In the case of A, B, the Voltage difference is VAB = VA-B.

And similar for VCB. Since the particle is + charged, the potential at A and C must be greater than B.

Apply qV = 1/2 mv2.


In part b, one found the increase in potential for each charge with respect to q1. One is correct for q2. However, when q3 is brought to the line, there are q1 and q2 which contribute to the electric field, and when q4 is brought to the line, there are q1, q2 and q3, present, so one must include the effect of each prior charge on the last charge.
 
1) i am confused, i though the particle was at rest at A and V and arrive at B with some velocity and how did you know that potential at A and C (equal) is greater than B


2) i change the equation and got thsi
i placed the charges as follow
q1 q2 q 3 q4
and used q1 as the starting point so EPE = 0
then i used the equation V = Kq/r and multiple the V by (1.6 micro columb) to get the EPE. I did that for q2 q3 q4 and changing r as i get closer to q4. Then i added all the EPE together but i am missing something.

EPE of q1 = 0
EPE of q2
(q1)(k)/(.36m) = V
EPE2 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

EPE of q3
(q)(k)/(.36m) + (q)(k)/(.36m x 2) = V
EPE3 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

EPE of q4
(q)(k)/(.36m) + (q)(k)/(.36m x 2) + (q)(k)/(.36m x 4) = V
EPE4 = (V)(1.6 micro columb)

Add EPE (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) = Total EPE of the group
 
1) i am confused, i though the particle was at rest at A and V and arrive at B with some velocity and how did you know that potential at A and C (equal) is greater than B

A positive charge moves from the more positive (+) potential to the less positive (more negative) potential. A negative charge is attracted to the more positive potential.

If one has a battery, there is (-) and (+) terminals, but the potential is measured with respect to some reference, e.g. ground. If there is a 5V potential diffence, that could be between 5 V and 0 V, or 10 V and 5 V, or 105 V and 100 V, . . . . It is the difference in potential that is important.

In part a, the particle starts at rest (no KE) and accelerates to some velocity vB while traveling between A and B, so

q(VA-VB) = 1/2 mvB2,

similarly

q(VC-VB) = 1/2 m(2vB)2


If the potential difference was negative (-V) and the charge was negative (-q), then the energy imparted to the negative charge (-q)(-V) = qV.
 
thanks i got it, how did know that q(delta)V = 1/2mv^2, i was tryin to look for a relationship between velocity and potential but could not figure it out


and can you check my work for #2, i stil could not get the correct answer
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top