Voltage Vector/Scalar Components, SI Units, Direction and Polarity.

AI Thread Summary
Voltage is classified as a scalar quantity, represented in SI units as joules per coulomb (J/C), indicating energy per unit charge without a directional component. While voltage has polarity, this does not equate to direction in physics, raising questions about the distinction between polarity and directionality. In alternating current applications, voltage can be expressed as a scalar function of time, modeled as a phasor, which simplifies analysis but does not make it a true vector. The equation for voltage incorporates acceleration, a vector quantity, yet voltage remains scalar due to its lack of directional attributes. The discussion invites clarification on these concepts and their implications in physics.
XPTPCREWX
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
All, please help me refine, restate, explain, understand, expand, add, remove, answer the below statements/ questions. Thanks in advance.

1.) Voltage is considered a scalar quantity. (J/C in SI Derived Units) which is a magnitude of energy per coulomb...no direction with this example. Some may say it has polarity, but is this polarity considered a direction in physics? If not what is the difference?

2.) Voltage can also be represented as a scalar function of time as with alternating current applications, where it appears as a phasor but is not really a vector. v(t) = V(peak) sin ( ωt + θ). It is just a method for simplifying and modeling the function by describing the quantity with a phase angle and peak magnitude which behaves like a vector on a real and imaginary coordinate plane.

3.) Voltage = [(kg) x (m/s^2) x (m) x (1/A)] in SI base units. Acceleration is clearly a vector quantity component of Voltage. Why then does it not make Voltage a vector quantity too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any takers?
 
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Back
Top