Volume integral over a gradient (quantum mechanics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on three homework problems related to quantum mechanics. The first problem involves calculating the density of states for a free particle in a three-dimensional box, with a solution provided that includes specific mathematical expressions. The second problem explores an integral identity involving vector and scalar fields, emphasizing the use of the divergence theorem and the conditions under which the identity holds. The third problem requires evaluating a more complex integral, with participants expressing confusion about its difficulty and the relevance of the previous identity. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying mathematical concepts in quantum mechanics.
astrocytosis
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



1) Calculate the density of states for a free particle in a three dimensional box of linear size L.

2) Show that ##\int f \nabla g \, d^3 x=-\int g \nabla f \, d^3 x## provided that ##lim_{r \rightarrow \inf} [f(x)g(x)]=0##

3) Calculate the integral ##\int xe^{-i\mathbf{q \cdot x}} e^{-Zr/a_0} \, d^3 x##

Homework Equations



Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
(1) seems straightforward; I followed the method in Sakurai and got $$\frac{m^{3/2}L^3 \sqrt{E}}{\pi^2 \hbar^2 \sqrt{2}}. $$ (2) and (3) though I'm confused about the context. am I supposed to be thinking of some specific functions when it comes to f and g? the limit is in r but the functions are of x? am I missing some identities that would help me solve it?

(3) doesn't look difficult but the professor said the calculation would be quite involved, so I'm clearly not thinking about it correctly, and I'm not seeing how the result (2) would help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I think all I need for (2) is the product rule since f*g is going to zero, but I'm still not sure how this relates to (3)
 
Hi astrocytosis,

I didn't check (1) so I can't really comment on that.

(2) To see this consider the follwoing. Let ##\bf v## be a vector field and ##u## a scalar field. Now one can prove that the following identity holds
$$
\mathop{\rm div}({\bf v}u)=
(\mathop{\rm div}{\bf v})\,u+
{\bf v}\cdot\mathop{\rm grad}u.
$$
Now let ##G## be a finite domain. We than have
$$
\int_{\partial G}{\bf v}\,u\;{\rm d}\boldsymbol\sigma
=\int_G\mathop{\rm div}({\bf v}u)\;{\rm d}^3y
=\int_G(\mathop{\rm div}{\bf v})\,u\;{\rm d}^3y+
\int_G{\bf v}\cdot\mathop{\rm grad}u\;{\rm d}^3y
$$
Now if we let ##G\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^3## and the limit you were given holds the integral over ##\partial G## vanishes and you get the desired identity.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top