- #36
- 14,373
- 6,866
Yes, but not a kind of non-unitarity which could pick up only one of the terms in the superposition. Such coarse-graining leads to decoherence, which induces a transition from a coherent to an incoherent superposition. The density matrix evolves from a pure state to a mixed state, i.e. from a non-diagonal matrix to a diagonal one. But the diagonal matrix still has more than one non-vanishing component on the diagonal (e.g. one corresponding to the dead cat and another to the alive cat), so the system still does not pick up only one of the possibilities.vanhees71 said:The non-unitarity comes in, because you project to the relevant macroscopic observables (coarse-graining).
To really get only one of the possibilities from this you need to assume something additional (for example a collapse, or some hidden variables, or many worlds), but you, as adherent of a minimal statistical ensemble interpretation, refuse to take any specific additional assumption. Yes, by accepting such a minimal interpretation you avoid unjustified speculations, but the problem is that such a minimal interpretation leaves some questions unanswered. For me, it's more honnest to risk with a possibly wrong answer (including collapse) than to pretend that there is no question.
Last edited: