- #1
mcstatz5829
- 10
- 2
There's no thermodynamics forum, so I'll post this here.
Things "freezing" in space has always bothered me ever since Tim Robbins removed his helmet while in orbit around Mars. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct...aw3EDjIXfRDkD56iV0A3X5gK&ust=1563459254378535
While I understand space is cold, less than 10 Kelvin cold, what always seems to be left out is heat transfer. Conduction and convection require physical contact to transfer heat, which doesn't apply in space.
That just leaves radiation.
Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, a 20 cm sphere of water at 300 Kelvin should radiate 221 watts (using 0.96 emissivity), which means less than 1 K temperature drop per second. I'm assuming the sphere retains it's shape though. I'm not sure what the surface area becomes when it boils, but taking the volume of the sphere and making it a cylinder 1E-5 meters thick gives me over 300 square meters and 600 million watts of radiation. That should freeze quick!
So, is it fair to say water will boil and freeze, but Tim Robbins just suffocates?
Things "freezing" in space has always bothered me ever since Tim Robbins removed his helmet while in orbit around Mars. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct...aw3EDjIXfRDkD56iV0A3X5gK&ust=1563459254378535
While I understand space is cold, less than 10 Kelvin cold, what always seems to be left out is heat transfer. Conduction and convection require physical contact to transfer heat, which doesn't apply in space.
That just leaves radiation.
Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, a 20 cm sphere of water at 300 Kelvin should radiate 221 watts (using 0.96 emissivity), which means less than 1 K temperature drop per second. I'm assuming the sphere retains it's shape though. I'm not sure what the surface area becomes when it boils, but taking the volume of the sphere and making it a cylinder 1E-5 meters thick gives me over 300 square meters and 600 million watts of radiation. That should freeze quick!
So, is it fair to say water will boil and freeze, but Tim Robbins just suffocates?