Wave Function for Delta Function Barrier with E<0

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a delta function barrier with E<0, participants express confusion regarding the wave function behavior when the energy of the particle is less than the potential. It is noted that typically, bound states exist when E is greater than Vmin, but in this case, E<0 implies that the particle cannot have bound states. The wave function is expected to exhibit tunneling effects, but the participants struggle to visualize what this means for E<0, leading to the assumption that the wave function might be zero everywhere. The consensus is that E<0 indicates the energy is always less than the minimum potential, complicating the understanding of the wave function in this scenario. Ultimately, the participants are left questioning the implications of having E<0 in the context of the delta function barrier.
Seriously
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Given a delta function barrier located at x=0: V(x) = +a * delta(x)
If you have a particle incident from the left with E<0, what does the wave function look like??

I have trouble with this because I thought the particle energy needed to be greater than the minimum potential (E > Vmin) for you to get a solution.

I figure there are no bound states (only scattered states). But what does that mean for the wave function with E<0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If E < V, you will get a tunelling effect (one of those things I will have to learn myself), but I think basically when you come out from the other end of the barrier, the energy of the wave is lower than the original wave. I'm not sure what the wave function \Psi will look like though...
 
But here, Vmin=0!

In a usual potential step or potential barrier problem, E>Vmin, and the wave function inside the barier or walls is an atenuation of where E>V. Here however, E<V everywhere! So my intuition tells me that psi would be 0 everywhere in this situation.

Could it be that there is an error in the question? That it E>0 was meant rather than E<0?
 
Exactly! Vmin=0... and therefore E<0 always gives E<Vmin. So I don't understand.

I double checked the question. It specifically states E<0. It then asks if there are any bound states (answer=no), and wants me to draw the wave function.

I was told that E<0 just means that the energy is less than the minimum potential energy which can be drawn anywhere. But this makes no sense to me.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top