Weak field Newtonian limit

lailola
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have to calculate the gravitational field strength g given by the De Sitter-Schwarzschild spacetime.

If G=c=1 I get:

R_{00}\simeq -kT_{00}+\frac{1}{2}kT\eta_{00}+\Lambda \eta_{00}\simeq

-kT_{00}+\frac{1}{2}kT_{00}\eta^{00}\eta_{00} +\Lambda \eta_{00}\simeq -\frac{1}{2}kT_{00}+ \Lambda =-\frac{1}{2}k\rho+ \Lambda

On the other side:

R_{00}\simeq -\Gamma_{00,j}^j \simeq -\frac{1}{2}\bigtriangledown^2g_{00}\simeq -\bigtriangledown^2 \phi

Equaling:

\bigtriangledown^2 \phi=\frac{1}{2}k\rho-\Lambda=4piG\rho-\Lambda

The first problem I have is that I don't know how to get this result in normal units, and the second problem is that, from here, I have to find the gravitational field strength g, and I don't know how to do it.

thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What precisely are "normal units"? I would say the units as you use here are just fine. Second, the gravitational field strength is given by

<br /> g^i \equiv \partial^i \phi <br />

whereas you have found an expression for \partial_i \partial^i \phi. Looking at the general method to solve the Poisson equation for lambda=0 should help you, e.g. here:

http://cass.ucsd.edu/~ppadoan/new_website/physics105b/Lecture3.pdf

You have an extra constant, which modifies this solution. See also

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0004037,

eqn.2.6.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
With 'normal' units I mean G=c=1
 
haushofer said:
What precisely are "normal units"? I would say the units as you use here are just fine. Second, the gravitational field strength is given by

<br /> g^i \equiv \partial^i \phi <br />

whereas you have found an expression for \partial_i \partial^i \phi. Looking at the general method to solve the Poisson equation for lambda=0 should help you, e.g. here:

http://cass.ucsd.edu/~ppadoan/new_website/physics105b/Lecture3.pdf

You have an extra constant, which modifies this solution. See also

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0004037,

eqn.2.6.

Thank you haushofer, those links have helped me a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lailola said:
With 'normal' units I mean G=c=1
Well, there is no c in your equations, so that's easy: just put G=1 :P

Glad I could help :)
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top