What Are Gödel Propositions and How Are They Derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Godel Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Gödel's theorem asserts that within any axiomatic system, there exist propositions that are undecidable or indicate the system's incompleteness. Gödel propositions can be derived from a set of axioms through a specific procedure that ensures their consistency with the axioms and their negations. This means that assuming either a Gödel proposition or its negation does not lead to contradictions. An example mentioned is the continuum hypothesis in relation to ZFC axioms. For a clearer understanding of these complex ideas, "Gödel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas H. Hofstadter is recommended as an accessible resource.
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
I was just reading about Godel's Theorem. I was unable to grasp the exact meaning of this sentence:

"These propositions, termed Gödel propositions, can be shown to exist by giving a procedure for returning a Gödel proposition from a set of axioms. This procedure forms the basis for proving Gödel's theorem"


from the paragraph:

Using the axioms we can derive propositions about the axioms. Gödel's theorem states that for any given axiomatic system there exists propositions that are either undecidable, or that the axiomatic system is incomplete. These propositions, termed Gödel propositions, can be shown to exist by giving a procedure for returning a Gödel proposition from a set of axioms. This procedure forms the basis for proving Gödel's theorem.

I don't understand what is meant by "..retruning a Godel proposition.."
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
computer speak: just means given the set of axioms there is a method of examining them and then writing down a proposition which is consistent with the axioms, and whose negation is also consistent with the axioms. Meaning if we assume it true there are no contradictions, and if we assume its negation is true there are still no contradictions. Example, the continuum hypothesis and the axioms of ZFC (godel propositions are a little unrealistic; formally they are correct, but practically they aren't propositions you might come across 'naturally')
 
You've probably already heard about or even read it, but I recommend Godel Escher Bach by Douglas H. It was the only layman book I read that broke down Godels argument for me in an understandable fashion. I read it when I was like ten and it still made sense to me, despite my age. That is the sign of a good author, since the idea itself isn't at all intuitive or obvious, especially to a kid.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

Similar threads

Back
Top