What Are Standing Waves and How Do Their Amplitudes Relate to Intensity?

AI Thread Summary
Standing waves occur when two waves of equal amplitude travel in opposite directions, resulting in a wave that does not propagate energy. The amplitude at each point varies, being zero at nodes and maximum at antinodes, which is crucial for understanding intensity. Intensity is related to the maximum amplitude at antinodes, not the zero amplitude at nodes. Confusion arises when discussing the overall amplitude of the standing wave versus the amplitude at specific points. Clarifying that the maximum amplitude is at the antinode resolves the misunderstanding regarding intensity and amplitude.
GAGS
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi all,actually i want to discuss about standing wave. Its little bit confusing to me.As a simple defintion,when two waves of equal amplitude travel in opposite direction then what the resultant wave,for which there is no propagation of energy is called standing waves.
But another property says that amplitude at each point in space stays constant and more the amplitude,more intense is the wave.Now question arises,If we are getting zero amplitude by superposition of 2 waves of equal amplitude,then what type of amplitude that is being discussed here. and we are saying that that all points have zero amplitude then how could we relate the intensity to amplitude.
Please reply,hope you have understand the question.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is a bit vague. If you are getting an amplitude of zero after superposition of two waves of equal amplitude, that means the two waves are exactly out of phase: the peaks cancel out the troughs exactly, like in the second (right-most) image here:
Interference_of_two_waves.png


If this is the case, there is no resultant sound wave and you cannot speak of its intensity.
 
There are two ways in which the word "amplitude" can be used in a standing wave. First, each point on the wave oscillates with some amplitude, which varies from one position to another along the wave. This amplitude is zero at a node and maximum at an antinode. Second, the standing wave as a whole has an amplitude which is the maximum amplitude of oscillation of any point on the wave, i.e. the amplitude at a node. [added: oops, I should have said "antinode" here.]
 
Last edited:
Hi jtbell,thanks for your response,but it is still confusing.On one side you said that amplitude is zero at a node and maximum at an antinode. On other side you said that ,the standing wave as a whole has an amplitude which is the maximum amplitude of oscillation, i.e. the amplitude at a node.
So kindly can you differentiate this.
 
I am pretty sure jtbell means the maximum amplitude of oscillation is at an antinode.
 
Oops yes, I meant the amplitude at an antinode. :blushing:
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...
Back
Top