What are the derivations, uses, and limitations of the extended Coulomb's Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an extended version of Coulomb's Law that incorporates terms for moving charges, which is compared to the Lorentz force equation to explain electrical forces in magnetism. The equation presented, F_{on 2 by 1} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}[ \widehat{r} + \frac{1}{c^{2}} \cdot \vec{v_{2}} \times ( \vec{v_{1}} \times \widehat{r})], is critiqued for being inaccurate, particularly in its treatment of the second term, which is said to require order v^2 corrections. The conversation seeks more information on the derivations, uses, and limitations of this extended law. Participants express a need for clarification on the correct formulation of the equation. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying Coulomb's Law to moving charges and the necessity for precise mathematical representation.
bicabone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My physics professor gave us an extended version of coulombs law which includes terms to account for moving charges. He then used (or rather compared) this law to the Lorentz force equation to give us a feel for the electrical forces generated by moving charges as he introduced us to magnetism. Does anyone know where I can find more information regarding this following equation (i.e. its derivations, uses, limitations, etc.)

F_{on 2 by 1} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}[ \widehat{r} + \frac{1}{c^{2}} \cdot \vec{v_{2}} \times ( \vec{v_{1}} \times \widehat{r})]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should come from the nonrelativistic limit of the field of a moving point charge, which you most easily obtain by a Lorentz boost of the four-vector potential of a charge at rest:

{A'}^{\mu}=(q/(4 \pi |\vec{x}'|),0,0,0).
 
That equation is never right.
Even in the non-relativistic limit, the second term is of order v^2, so order v^2 corrections to the first term are required.
 
That equation is never right.

Perhaps you can tell us what it should be.
 
\frac{d{\bf p}}{dt}=<br /> \frac{-qq&#039;[{\bf r}+{\bf v\times(v&#039;\times r)}]}<br /> {\gamma_{v&#039;}^2[{\bf r}^2-({\bf v&#039;\times r)^2}]^{\frac{3}{2}}},<br />
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top