What Are the Everyday Examples of Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter summersnow69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
Examples of simple harmonic motion (SHM) in everyday life include the vibrations of musical instruments and the functioning of car shock absorbers, which involve mass, spring, and damping elements. The discussion highlights the mathematical representation of SHM, contrasting it with damped harmonic motion. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding oscillations through these practical applications. The conversation seeks additional examples beyond the commonly cited spring and pendulum. Overall, recognizing SHM in daily phenomena enhances comprehension of oscillatory systems.
summersnow69
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
SIMPLE HARMONIC MOTION--help needed

Hello ,

i m looking for examples for simple harmonic motion,.. how does this theory apply in daily life?

I had go through the net

, i find that the examples given are the simple motion of the spring and pendulum. Any other examples on this?

I would very appreciate on your reply as this will really help me in my understanding in oscilliations
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Many musical instruments produce their sounds by vibrations, which are combinations of simple harmonic motions.
 


What about the shock absorber of a car? You have a mass (m),spring (k) and damper(c/2m).

F=ma
Fs+Fd=my"

y"+(c/2m)y'+(k/m)y=0,<-this is damped HM

y"+(k/m)y=0<- this SHM the damper is not included

IC's: y(0)=K1 y'(0)=K2 <-these could be any values
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top