What are the options for boundary conditions in ANSYS WB structural analysis?

AI Thread Summary
In ANSYS WB Mechanical, selecting appropriate boundary conditions is crucial for accurate structural analysis. A static support on one end can provide proper reaction forces but may lead to singularities at the edges, which can be ignored. A recommended approach is to kinematically constrain the block to allow deformation without rigid body motion, such as fixing a central node and applying zero translations at specific points. An alternative involves applying loads at the edges with no deformation constraints, which introduces "weak springs" to prevent rigid body motion. The preferred method ensures an idealized response, allowing the block to expand and deform naturally.
raunak(esmilo)
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to perform a simple simulation in ANSYS WB Mechanical. Description is given below in image, thickness of the plate is 5 mm. Problem is I am unable to decide which type of support should I provide for this.
 

Attachments

  • WS9.jpg
    WS9.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 690
Engineering news on Phys.org
Static support on one end - this will give propper reaction forces.
Note however that you migh get singularities on the edges of that face. That is normal hence you can ignore them.
 
Boundary conditions for this kind of problem are a bit of an art form, ideally you will want to "kinematically constrain" the block such that it can deform but not have any rigid body motion. Based on the forces being applied you have a few options I can think of:

  1. Strive's solution: fix the nodes on one side of the block, apply 40 kN to the opposite side. This has the disadvantage of not allowing deformation in the x-direction along that face. This may be a problem depending on your desired analysis outcome.
  2. Possible alternative: apply the loads at the edges of the block and use no deformation constraints. This will result in "weak springs" being added to the model to prevent rigid body motion (http://xansys.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=86806); in theory you will still get a usable result.
  3. Preferred solution: constrain the block using kinematic principles. Assuming this is a 2-d analysis I would recommend defining a node in the center of the block and apply zero X and Y translation (prevents rigid body motion); also apply zero Y translation at a single node at the midpoint edge of the block. This will prevent rigid body motion (center node) and rotation (edge node), and should give you the most "idealized" response for the block (i.e. it will expand and deform as if floating in space with nothing holding it).
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top