What Are the Origins of Entangled Particles?

edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
I would find it helpful to have a list of where entangled particles come from (perhaps there is a good internet site with such a list that someone could post?). Along those lines I would like to start and refine such a list of entangled particles, what is entangled and get some feedback on the correctness of such a list. Here goes:

1/ gamma rays - when close to a nucleon, may produce an entangled electron/positron pair where the spin of the particles is opposite and the direction of motion of the particles is opposite.

2/ photons - when fired at a birefringent crystal, may produce entangled photons where the energy of the 2 photons add up to the original, the spin of both is the same, and the direction depends on the crystal.

3/ electrons - when falling into an energy level, if they have enough energy, may emit 2 photons with the same spin traveling in opposite directions where the energy of one photon minus the other, adds up to the difference in the energy level the electron finds itself in compared to the energy level it was at. (this may be the same as 2, but I am not sure?).

4/ nucleon decay - elements (especially with lots of extra neutrons) may decay and emit entangled electrons, where the spin of the electrons is opposite and direction is opposite.

Others?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edguy99 said:
2/ photons - when fired at a birefringent crystal, may produce entangled photons where the energy of the 2 photons add up to the original, the spin of both is the same, and the direction depends on the crystal.

Parametric down conversion is usually classified as the following:

Type I: It takes 2 of these crystals (oriented perpendicular) to get entanglement. The photons are parallel (same) polarization.

Type II: Only need 1 crystal, the photon pair output is perpendicular (opposite).
 
edguy99 said:
Others?

Probably hundreds, based on papers I have seen. Many of which could be called exotic, such as this one: http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3662

All kinds of atomic structures can display entanglement, which often arises when components of a system are in indistinguishable configurations and there is a conservation rule in effect. Check at arxiv advanced search, variations of entanglement and experiment, such as this one:

http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/abs:+AND+entangled+experimental/0/1/0/all/0/1
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
369
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top