- #71
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 23,082
- 6,751
netgypsy said:You drew the conclusion, not I.
You said:
The implication is pretty hard to interpret any other way:Which leads to another interesting question - cells divide by binary fission so I see no immediate reason why an entire human couldn't do the same and produce two where there is now one using this method. (To add to the mix, I seem to recall a study which indicated memory can be passed on by eating part of an individual - the study was with lower order species but a behavior was trained, then the trained individual was fed to the untrained which then exhibited the behavior of the trained individual.) Of course there are technical difficulties in a case like this, but assuming it could be done,
"I see no reason why humans couldn't divide by fission..."
"... lower order species had their trained behavior fed to others untrained...etc"
"of course there are technical difficulties in a case like this, but assuming it could be done"
So, what exactly does it refer to?Oh. OK, it turns out that is what you meant:
Why bother telling me I jumped to a conclusion if it was the correct conclusion?But as we study memory is there any law of physics violated by the concept that memory can be transferred from one individual to another?
Anyway, addressing the question you asked:
Individual what? Human? If you don't want to people to misinterpret you, you must be explicit with your terms.is there any law of physics violated by the concept that memory can be transferred from one individual to another?
No it can't happen. The amount of brain matter required to be considered a discrete memory in a higher order life form is far too large to be absorbed through the wall of the digestive tract, or make it intact through the circulatory system or past the blood-brain barrier. And after all that, the brain does not build its neuronal net by attaching stray neuronal fragments of material to itself.
Last edited: