- #71
- 927
- 484
pinball1970 said:I disagree with this, it is difficult to quantify biologically but what makes a good musician and great one comes down to talent like everything else.
You cannot learn to play football like George best, you have to be George best. One can practice get better get fitter learn things but one cannot "learn" to play like that.
You cannot learn how to sing like Ian Gillan or play Drums like Buddy Rich, it is who they are/were.
We have had similar discussions about talent regarding mathematics, can anyone get a PhD/published in Mathematics? answer? No.
Well, I have to disagree with all these too but in any case I respect your opinion. We just see this thing from a different angle. Personally, I think that people attribute to talent things that are not at all obvious or even evident that belong there. In order for anyone to be sure if there is such thing and in this case if it is an all-in-one cure for all, he / she has to have the exact same reasons to conceive and learn music, the same concentration and the same "environment variables" regarding home, family and a multitude of other things - not to mention a multitude of personal character features, with a "talented" person. This, obviously, cannot be done, so it leaves a huge ambiguity, at least for me, that the second person "was born" to be a musician or anything else for that matter. Also, I don't like at all the extraordinary magic nature that is attributed to talent. If a person has not great will to learn music or in other words music "does not speak" to his / her soul then he / she will never learn. Trying to learn something just for fun or for the heck of it cannot lead to anything great but definitely to something mediocre at best.
Of course, needless to say that I can't claim or prove that there is not such thing as talent but even if there is, I don't really thing that it is what many people believe to be.
Jimi Hendrix himself - which I regard as the huge difference that gave to electric guitar a whole new sense, meaning and he put it in orbit regarding the way this instrument was used before him, was very moderate and when a journalist told him "People regard you as the best player in the world" he responded by looking at the chair in which he was sitting and said "who is this guy you talk about?" - I just give it in my own words but with no loss of its original meaning. How many hours did he practice and played / composed songs? Countless. What were his real innate reasons about learning music? No one can tell with a hundred per cent accuracy. How concentrated was in what he was doing? Very much. How much did he love his guitar and playing? Really excessively. So, after these questions, did the "talent" made him what he become or even if there was talent, can we attribute his huge success to talent alone? I don't know for sure but I don't think so.
Last edited: