- #141
Anttech
- 233
- 0
It is well documented that Isreal does not give the same rights to Non-Jews in Isreal as Jews...
People of all religions who have lived in Israel through its establishment have Israeli citizenship. That includes Muslims, Christians and other religions. Anyone marrying an Israeli partner will receive an Israeli citizenship, anyone born in Israel will receive an Israeli citizenship, and so on.Bilal said:Israel is established as Jews State. This means any person convert to Judaism (usually after complex process) will be granted automatically the Israeli nationality as he/she arrives the country, while people who live there for centuries have no equal right because they are not Jews.
Here is the Israeli Parliament makeup: Likud (secular): 40 seats, Labour (secular): 28 seats, Shinui (anti-religious): 14 seats, Shas (religious): 11 seats, Ihud Leumi (secular and progressive religious): 7 seats, National Religious Party: 4 seats, Agudat Israel (religious): 3 seats, Hadash-Taal (Arab and Communist): 3 seats, National Democratic Assembly (Arab): 3 seats, 4 seats to 2 religious parties and 2 more to an Arab party, 2 independent members, totaling 120 seats.Bilal said:Nobody can ignore the effect of religious parties in Israel today (Shas, Hamevdal ..etc) , also they still used the theory of (promised biblical land) to justify building more settlements in the occupied land.
That law has since been discussed in the Supreme court, which decided it is illegal and was returned to the Parliament for ammendment.Bilal said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3111727.stm
((Israeli law limits Arab citizenship
The Israeli parliament passed a law preventing Palestinians married to Israelis from gaining Israeli citizenship.
Human rights groups have condemned the law as racist but supporters say it is necessary for security reasons and to maintain the Jewish character of the state of Israel.
The law will prevent Palestinians from the occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza from marrying Arab-Israelis, who make up about 20% of the population of Israel.
That's a very broad statement, I suppose you expect me to take your word for its validity. Seeing your previous post, I don't think I should.Anttech said:It is well documented that Isreal does not give the same rights to Non-Jews in Isreal as Jews...
True, and finally the Catholic church has begun to address the issue of priests who molest children, though there are a few other glaring matters in need of improvement, such as allowing (or better yet encouraging) the use of condoms to prevent AIDS, etc. With regard to the extremism that we now see here in the US, I can only hope there will be change toward moderation, tolerance, and respect for other people's right to believe differently from the Christian faith (or should I say their interpretation of it) or to have no faith at all. Personally I do not hold much hope for these things.russ_watters said:Mostly correct (about my meaning), with the caveat that I said "an awful lot of the bad things", meaning some, but not all of them were corrected. In fact, I think my posts imply that I believe an awful lot of bad things still exist. This sentence was meant to imply exactly that: "And recent rifts suggest we may be nearing a second Reformation." This means that I think there are enough bad things to warrant a second reformation - a second major reorganization of the Catholic Church specifically, and pretty much all of Christianity in general.
Agreed that most Christian religions believe one can only be saved through Christ. I do not know whether there is a similar belief in Judaism, or if one can convert. At least Muslims and Jews are not into proselyting as with Christianity. However, I believe Muslims have required conversion by force, for example when invading Iran.Bilal said:...Islam is the only religion who accepts the other religions, which is not the case in Christianity and Judaism...[23]
Last I heard on the news, it is related to Blair and the holding of certainMcGyver said:One can't help but think back to the inflammatory rhetoric between France and Brittain over the future Olympic site selection. To everyone's surprise, Brittain won. The following day, this occurred. Related, or complelely unrelated?
When discussing these terrorists it is impossible to discuss their acts and motivation with discussing their religion because that is the basis for their actions.Astronuc said:And I just realized that this thread seems OT and is getting very close to a religious discussion or discussion of religion, although more from a historical or sociological perspective. Not sure where to go with this - guidance please.
Evo said:When discussing these terrorists it is impossible to discuss their acts and motivation with discussing their religion because that is the basis for their actions.
Evo said:When discussing these terrorists it is impossible to discuss their acts and motivation with discussing their religion because that is the basis for their actions.
Burnsys, terror acts have been comitted in name of religions since the birth of religion. They used swords instead of plastci explosives, but it's still terror.Burnsys said:That is a nice scapegoat evo. but religion exist from the beginin of humankind adn terrorist act no more that 30 years or a little more.
Of course religions plays a role in the terrorist but it's not their main motivation. may be religion make them to do crazy acts like killing themselfs but their are mainly motivated by injustices comited by 1st world countrys, for example suporting and helping dictators who killed and tortured them, overtrowing democracys, taking all their natural resources and teching their kids that If out of 10 atheists, 5 are killed by 1 Muslim, 5 would be left. etc...
Summary: Radical Islam is spreading across Europe among descendants of Muslim immigrants. Disenfranchised and disillusioned by the failure of integration, some European Muslims have taken up jihad against the West. They are dangerous and committed -- and can enter the United States without a visa.
Ron_Damon said:Everyday Muslims (and many in this very board) call America, Israel, Americans, Bush, the West, Christians, Jews, etc. the whole spectrum of hatred-inspired language, yet if you dare to talk about the many shortcomings of Muslim civilization one is immediately labeled a Fascist...
What does this mean?
Ron_Damon said:Does it really come back to Israel? I need to buy a couple of history books from the period.
Hurkyl said:
Bilal said:…Those people doing these attacks in the name of Islam, so I will never forgive them, I wish they will be annihilated completely and soon… they gave dirty image for our nations.That works for me.
...
Yonoz said:That's a very broad statement, I suppose you expect me to take your word for its validity. Seeing your previous post, I don't think I should.
How about you give us a specific example that we can discuss?
Do excuse me if I don't respond promptly as I'm going to spend the weekend away from home and it might take a while until I view this thread.
Anttech said:Be it the Isrealie troops terror on the normal peace loving Palistines, or Al-quedas Terrorism in London a few days ago!
Ron_Damon said:so you propose Jews pick up their things, leave Palestine, and go where?? Put yourself in their place. At least they don't deliberately target innocent men, women and children going to work or school in a public bus... the way I see it, that land does not belong to either Jews nor Palestinians, but is in dispute, and since both can't have it, and they can't live together, let it got to the most deserving people (the Jews in my estimation).
Bilal said:Do you support... fascism and ethic cleansing?
It's also well documented that jews are not given the same rights in Arab countries that they are allowed to live in...oh, wait..erm which countries were those?Anttech said:It is well documented that Isreal does not give the same rights to Non-Jews in Isreal as Jews...
I think it's fair, but not workable without international intervention. Which countries could do this? I think it would have to be countries that do not have a past history of Jewish persecution...and countries that will not be seen as a "Christian Crusader"...Art said:How does the middle east road map initiative suit? The fact it is equally unpopular with both Israel and Palestine suggests it it probably fair. Do you think?
kat said:It's also well documented that jews are not given the same rights in Arab countries that they are allowed to live in...oh, wait..erm which countries were those?
Oh, hey...by the way..do you think Palestinians who sell property to Jews should be beheaded? Also well documented.
More like Jerry Springer doing his show in London a few years ago.Smurf said:Did anyone else first wonder if this thread was about The Clash and wonder why it was in the political sub-forum?
Art said:How does the middle east road map initiative suit? The fact it is equally unpopular with both Israel and Palestine suggests it it probably fair. Do you think?
GENIERE said:And borrowing from Kat… It's also well documented that Palestinians are not given the same rights in Arab countries that they are allowed to live in...oh, wait..erm which countries were those? I think it might be Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Lebanon. Maybe these nations think they should wander in the dessert for forty years.
...
Lol, what planet are you on? There were 278 attacks in the first three weeks after the "road map" was supposedly implimented. They included Shots fired at towns and villages, Shots fired at military installations, Assaults/stabbings, Bombings, Mortar bombs, Hit and run attacks by vehicles, Bombs were found, Anti-tank missiles, Grenades and Rockets were used, and there were drive-by shootings and even terror attacks inside Israel.Bilal said:Palestinian accepted road map initiative, for this reason they stop attacking Israel since more than 6 months, while Israel continue building settlements and stealing more lands in WB.
Riigght. I'm curious of something though. Do you think Israeli Arabs want to become a part of Palestine or would they prefer to continue that the land the occupy remain a part of Israel?Gaza is only 5% of occupied Palestinian land, so their withdrawal is not enough as some people think.
Based on what? Sorry, but borders have not been drawn up or agreed upon and are not to be drawn up until later in the roadmap.They should accept to withdraw completely to 1967 border.
Lol, what planet are you on?
Thats not the point, the point is that Isreal is not only occupying Palestine land, but continues to build on occupied terrories... They need withdrawn, and allow the Palestines to live there! If they want to create a whole state, then NON-jews need the exact same rights as Jews...Do you think Israeli Arabs want to become a part of Palestine or would they prefer to continue that the land the occupy remain a part of Israel?
Put yourself in their place. At least they don't deliberately target innocent men, women and children going to work or school in a public bus.
Something I read somewhere: the Socialist ultra-Leftist mayor of London
the way I see it, that land does not belong to either Jews nor Palestinians, but is in dispute, and since both can't have it, and they can't live together, let it got to the most deserving people (the Jews in my estimation).
Anttech said:Killing >150,000 people in Iraq