What Causes Raindrops to Follow a Tail on a Train Window?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Window
AI Thread Summary
Raindrops on a train window exhibit parabolic trajectories influenced by gravity and wind, leaving behind a water tail that subsequent drops tend to follow due to cohesion and surface tension. The attraction between water molecules and the glass surface causes the drops to flatten, while surface tension encourages them to minimize their surface area. This interplay results in a metastable trail that can break apart under mechanical disturbances, reverting to spherical droplets. The phenomenon challenges the 'no-slip boundary condition' in fluid mechanics, highlighting ongoing research into contact line motion. Understanding these dynamics reveals complex interactions between fluid behavior and surface properties.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Today I was taking the train to a nearby city, where we passed through some rainy region.
As the raindrops fell on the window, one could see their trajectories almost followed a parabola depending on their initial conditions. That is something expected, due to gravity and the forces acted on them by the running wind.
However as you see them moving, they leave behind a water tail - something like a stream-, and that tail is the preferred way the rest drops will follow (they move up to it, and then they follow it). Why is this happening?
Also if there are no more drops to follow that tail, it will suddenly break apart to stationary drops. Why is this happening? I don't think it's due to statistics, because if it was that, you wouldn't see the whole line to be divided simultaneously. It's more like, due to tension forces on the water, it's an unstable "structure"- under some perturbations it falls apart all together.
I hope I made the questions clear. Looking forward to your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can say that the reason why rain drops will tend to follow the trails of other drops is because of the property known as cohesion. As water molecules come close to one another the hydrogen bonds attract the molecules together.
 
I think there are two processes going.

The first is attraction between glass and water molecules. Glass is slightly hydroscopic, so water molecules can bond very weakly to the glass surface. This will tend to flatten the water drop that is in contact with the surface. This is basic surface wetting.

The second is surface tension of water. The system of water molecules will try to arrange itself to minimize its potential energy, which means minimizing total surface tension, which basically translates to maximizing volume-to-surface ratio. So a droplet, in absence of other forces, will be perfectly spherical.

So hydroscopic attraction will try to spread the water out, and surface tension will try to gather it up. The result is the trail that you see. A water trail is probably only metastable mechanically, so some mechanical disturbance (like the car shaking, or air turbulence) will shift it into the other stable state - a round droplet. When this happens, the trail breaks up.

The attraction also acts as friction. Attraction obviously drops off with distance from the surface. So a trail can sort of "shield" new droplets from the surface. They experience less friction and can travel faster along a trail.
 
ChrisVer said:
<snip> Why is this happening?
<snip>

You have observed a simple phenomenon that contradicts a central assertion in fluid mechanics: the 'no-slip boundary condition'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-slip_condition

The complete answer to your question is still unknown- if you read the last few sentences in the 'exceptions' section above. Another good description of the no-slip condition is here:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0501557.pdf

To your specific questions, you are observing contact line motion, which is still an active area of fundamental research:

http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140734
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top