What Did I Do Wrong? Get Answers from Other Mentors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a member's request for feedback on their post regarding a patent for a perpetual motion machine, which is against forum rules. Mentors clarified that the thread was intended solely for patent-related inquiries, and deviations into perpetual motion discussions led to its closure. Warnings issued by mentors are not considered infractions but serve to inform members about rule violations. The importance of adhering to forum guidelines was emphasized to maintain order and focus in discussions. Ultimately, the thread was locked due to persistent off-topic discussions despite prior warnings.
Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Could please other mentors than ZapperZ look at this thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=195503&page=2 starting post 25 and tell me what I did wrong?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you'd read the previous posts and indeed the forum rules you would realize that discussion of perpetual motion machines is prohibited. The thread you posted in was discussing how one would obtain a patent and not a discussion about the mechanism of any perpetual motion device. I think ZapperZ was quite clear.

Personally I think he's done a stellar job of maintaining order in a thread that has the potential to go awry quickly.
 
Last edited:
The thread was only permitted to stay open initially because the primary question was how to file for a patent. It was made clear that this was the only topic permitted for discussion in that thread right from the start. As suspected, it did not stay on that topic, and has since been locked.
 
Kurdt, are serious? Let's assume you are.

Again, I was posting this in the general discussion forum:

<Quote deleted by Moonbear...if we deleted the text before, it isn't allowed here either.>
ZapperZ deleted this, send me a warning where he accused me of advertising this firm, and then two posts later he called me lucky that got no infraction points!

I am for two years now member of this forum and would like to be treated more respectfully.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ratzinger, take it to PM. The mentors weighed in at the beginning of that thread, made the limits on the discussion clear, and you took the discussion beyond those limits. Period. Warnings are NOT infractions. Since you've already publicly aired that you received a warning, I'll just remind everyone that warnings (with no infraction points) are just our way of informing you why your post was deleted (or moved, or reminding of the rules, etc.), just like it says in the PM that is sent with the warning. It also creates a record of the warning for the other mentors to view, so we all know what action was taken and exactly what was said in the PM from the mentor. That's all it is and there's no reason to be getting all worked up about it.

We were trying to keep that thread on-topic, because we knew right from the start it had the potential to quickly go off-topic into a direction that is specifically not allowed on this forum, per our forum guidelines. Once it became apparent that a few deletions of discussion of perpetual motion and repeated warnings within the thread were not stopping people from veering off in that direction, the thread was locked.

That's it. Discussion of it is over.
 
Homework Statement: Not applicable. I'm asking about a technical problem with the PhysicsForums software Relevant Equations: \left(-2+2 \,\mathrm{I}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \left(-2+2 \,\mathrm{I}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} I posted the LaTeX code for an expression in the "relevant equations" and "attempt at a solution" boxes. When I'm in the "attempt at a solution" box and I click "Preview," I do not see a preview of the expression properly displayed, only the code. After I post this message...

Similar threads

Back
Top