What did Newton destroy beyond repair?

  • Thread starter Thread starter riddlingminion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newton
AI Thread Summary
Newton fundamentally challenged Aristotelian physics by introducing the concept that an object in motion remains in motion unless acted upon by an external force, effectively dismantling the previous belief that a force was necessary to maintain motion. This shift marked a significant transition in understanding motion and inertia, which was encapsulated in Newton's first law of motion. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the term "Mechanical Universe," suggesting it relates to the broader implications of Newton's work in redefining physical laws. Participants express a lack of familiarity with Newton's contributions and the historical context of his theories. Ultimately, Newton's advancements laid the groundwork for modern physics, replacing outdated notions with a more accurate framework for understanding motion.
riddlingminion
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. In the introduction to the Mechanical Universe, what did Newton destroy beyond repair

2. What did Newton create to take its place?


Homework Equations


I don't think this question has to do with equations, as it is only worth one mark.



The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to start with this, this question is part of an introductory assignment on sig digs, and I've attempted to google this, but I can't find anything. I must clearly be missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much do you know about Newton and what he accomplished? Before his time, the largest part of the common knowledge of nature was based on Aristotelian philosophy. What area of physics was Newton most active in or most famous for? Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica might give you a clue. What was Newton a big advocate for?
 
Well the thing is we haven't learned a thing about Newton yet. But I know he has these three laws of motion from what I've googled about him, I just can't see how that links into destorying something beyond repair? I must be thinking about this question too literally, one sec, i'll google this aristolian guy, never heard of him.
 
K I really have no idea what to do here, I can't even figure out what the mechanical universe is. Any more help? You guys are my only hope.
 
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill"

That quote encompass much. What you are looking for can be many things, but I reckon that it must be something that spans over many sections.

Do you know anything about motion in Aristotelian philosophy? Before Newton's time, it was thought that an object needed to be supplied with a force to start moving and if that force was removed, the object would come to a natural stop in its motion. It wasn't really called force back then. 'Something' would be a better choice of words in this paragraph.

However, Newton changed much of that by declaring that motion continues in a straight line with constant speed as long as it wasn't affected by a resulting force. See Newtons first law. Don't remember the name, but remember the concept.

This may sound somewhat counterintuitive, as if you roll something over a table, it will eventually stop due to friction. Nonetheless, if there were no friction or air resistance and so on (resulting forces affecting it), the object will continue to move in a straight line with constant velocity.

See this for more information: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/newt.html#nt1
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top