What do we mean by minus energy ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue bloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Mean
blue bloom
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
what do we mean by"minus" energy ??

in the classic physics the minus energy express the gain or loss of the particle ..but when we substitute in the quantum theory lows ,the electron has a minus energy ..I think the energy is not like the charge to be minus ..& I can not also imagine any particle even a small one have a minus energy ..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Right, all particles in QM have plus energy.
 


It just depends on how you define potential energy...
 


The energy is taken relative to some state (which is defined to have zero energy -- this sometimes happens implicitly). The reason is that in any particular process you only talk about energy differences anyway.

On top of this: usually the negative energy states refer to bounded states, while positive energy states refer to unbounded states.
 


xepma said:
On top of this: usually the negative energy states refer to bounded states, while positive energy states refer to unbounded states.

Exactly.

Bob_for_short said:
Right, all particles in QM have plus energy.

No, xepma has it right.
 


xepma said:
On top of this: usually the negative energy states refer to bounded states, while positive energy states refer to unbounded states.

I think this is the logistic reply ..
I asked a teacher about this ,he told me that if we considered the energy between the electron & the proton equal zero before gravitation ,then the attraction would lead to lose energy & that make the energy of electron always minus (we find that in Bohr's equation)
but I still don't know what are the results of these sign??
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top