My impression of "color force" is just that it's a convenient mathematical way of describing how the charges interact with each other. The idea (I think) is that color force exists only between two different color charges. One of the unique properties of the color force is that it decreases as the distance between two hypothetical "quarks" decreases, in an almost linear form. What this means is that it is impossible to separate the quarks (because eventually, you'd just create enough energy to suck up a new quark from the vacuum and create a new particle). This is consistent with the color model of the quark, because the net color of, say "green" and "anti-green" is white (another aspect of color charge is that the net color of a particle must be "white"; red green and blue add together to give white).
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation.
It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........
This confused me, sorry.
All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong)
I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity?
Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity?
Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question.
Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition:
https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/
As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA