What Does 's' Represent in the Laplace Transform of Control Theory?

AI Thread Summary
In the context of the Laplace transform, 's' represents complex frequency, encompassing both real and imaginary components. The real part of 's' relates to exponential damping, while the imaginary part corresponds to oscillatory behavior, often expressed as s = jw, where w is the frequency in Hertz. This framework allows for the analysis of various signal behaviors, including exponentially decaying or growing signals and time-harmonic signals. The Laplace transform provides a more general approach to exciting linear systems compared to Fourier analysis, which focuses solely on pure imaginary values of 's'. Understanding 's' as part of the complex plane is essential for grasping control theory concepts.
Rob K
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Good day to you people,

I have just started learning control theory at Uni, as part of my course, and I have to admit it is quite difficult to grasp.

I am starting from the basics, and I am having difficulty understanding what 's' is supposed to represent as regards the Laplace transform.

for example:

L{f(t)} = F(s)

Now to me these variables represent the following:

L - as in Laplace transform of a
f - function of
t - time

is equal to

F - Laplace function of
s - ??

I am slightly confusing it with Dynamics and Statics I think, where 's' refers to displacement. And so I am naming that as something I am aware of.
My guessing is that the 's' is referring to the s-plane as a complex plane, but still that is a difficult concept to grasp.
Can anyone give me some sort of analogy or point me at a resource that might be able to help a student understand this concept and it's relationship to the poles of a system.

Sorry for giving such a vague post, but I don't know how to narrow this down any more at the moment.

Kind regards

Rob
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
S is the complex frequency.

The imaginary part is the usual frequency. In fact, you often see S=jw when there is no real part. w=2pi * frequency (Hz)

The real part represents an imaginary frequency which is also called exponential damping.

f(t) = e^(-St).

If S is pure imaginary you have time harmonic signals (sinusoids). If its only real you have exponentially decaying (or growing) signals. If S is complex then you have a ringing bell- an exponentially decaying sinusoid.

It's a very general way to exite a linear system, a little more general than Fourier analysis where S is pure imaginary.
 
Brilliant, after an evening of studying the intuition of complex numbers, this now makes a little bit of sense to me.

Thank you very much antiphon.

I a may be back for a little more, but this is good for me to be going on with.

Kind regards

Rob K
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top