What Does the Spin-0 State Mean for Photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
Sorry if it is a silly question: Photons have spin-1 and therefore they have theoretically three possible spin states (1,0,-1), For the ±1 case I can see the relation to the ±helicity, but what corresponds physically to the 0 state case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TrickyDicky said:
Sorry if it is a silly question: Photons have spin-1 and therefore they have theoretically three possible spin states (1,0,-1), For the ±1 case I can see the relation to the ±helicity, but what corresponds physically to the 0 state case?

The spin-0 case can be eliminated through a choice of gauge. So it's not considered physical.
 
This issue is discussed here:
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic473482.files/08-gaugeinvariance.pdf (in Section 3.3)
 
stevendaryl said:
The spin-0 case can be eliminated through a choice of gauge. So it's not considered physical.

stevendaryl said:
This issue is discussed here:
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic473482.files/08-gaugeinvariance.pdf (in Section 3.3)

Ah, ok, thanks. I was neglecting the difference between massive and massless for spin-1 particles.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top