What exaclty is energy on a quantum level?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Quantum
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
I know if energy just suddenly appears in a vacuum it will become radiation in some random form of frequency/wavelength, but what exactly is it on a quantum level? Possibly particle fluctuations of some sort of "energon" (made it up myself). What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
made it up myself
You're the one making it up. So what is the energy on a quantum level?

In our universe, energy can't just 'appear' in a vacuum. Not would energy become random radiation.
 
There is no principal difference between energy in classical and quantum physics. It is just a useful concept which helps physicists to calculate outcomes of experiments. Practically, however, it looks quite different in the 2 cases.

Classically, the energy of a system is defined as the amount of work done by forces to bring it to its current state. Such definition is not very useful in quantum mechanics, because notions like force or trajectory don't make much sense there. Actually, energy is a concept which proved to be extremely useful in quantum mechanics. But one still has to be careful to make the quantum definition agree with the classical one when the quantum effects are negligible. That is, if you push a trolley on 1 meter applying a force 1 Newton, then even if you calculate the outcome using time-dependent perturbation theory of the Schroedinger equation, you must get that the energy of the trolley increases by 1 Joule.

In QM, the energy is essential mostly because the energy operator H (hamiltonian) governs the time-evolution of any system through the Schroedinger equation. Energy can then be defined as the expectation value of H.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top