What Frequency Appears as 1 Hz When Sampled at 0.2 Seconds Due to Aliasing?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the next higher frequency that appears as a 1 Hz wave when sampled at 0.2 seconds (5 Hz sampling frequency), it is essential to consider the Nyquist theorem, which states that the sampling frequency must be at least twice the frequency being sampled. Sampling a 1 Hz signal at this rate is feasible, but it results in a coarse representation. However, attempting to sample higher frequencies like 4 Hz or 11 Hz at the same rate leads to aliasing, making them indistinguishable. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper sampling rates to avoid confusion in digital signal representation. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate signal analysis and interpretation.
kakolukia786
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have been given a plot for 1 Hz, sampled at 0.2 sec. And, 4 Hz and 11 Hz has also been plotted. So, from the plot, I can see that its really hard to distinguish between the signals after digitalization. My question is how do I find the next higher frequency which, when sampled at 0.2 secs, will look like a 1 Hz wave ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kakolukia786 said:
Hi. I have been given a plot for 1 Hz, sampled at 0.2 sec. And, 4 Hz and 11 Hz has also been plotted. So, from the plot, I can see that its really hard to distinguish between the signals after digitalization. My question is how do I find the next higher frequency which, when sampled at 0.2 secs, will look like a 1 Hz wave ?
Do you mean 0.2s duration of sampling (with a given sampling frequency), or do you mean one sample every 0.2s (5Hz sampling frequency)?

Vidar
 
I mean one sample every 0.2 seconds
 
kakolukia786 said:
I mean one sample every 0.2 seconds

In general you need at least two samples per cycle. You have a sampling frequency of 5Hz. Sampling 1Hz with this is not a problem - however very coarse plot. Using the same sampling frequency when you have 4 and 11Hz input would not provide any results at all.
According to Nyquist theorem, the minimum sampling frequency is twice the frequency you are trying to sample. Below you see a link to a PDF explaining this.

http://redwood.berkeley.edu/bruno/npb261/aliasing.pdf


Vidar
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top