What Happened to Heisenberg's Constant in Planck Units?

  • Thread starter Thread starter droog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
droog
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm very confused. Energy can be expressed as:

h.C/wavelength

So, in Planck units, the energy of the plank mass could be written

h-bar.C/Lp

h-bar is in units of m^2 S ^-1 and C is in m s^-1
In plank units h-bar=Lp^2 Tp^-1 and C=Lp/Tp
So h-bar.c/Lp=Lp^2. T^-1.Lp.T^-1.Lp^-1 = C^2

Giving energy for plank mass = C^2 and mass = 1

Where did Henisenberg’s constant go? How can it be lost by selecting a different form of notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any constant with diumension can be transformed away by using suitable dimensions. For instance, if light years are used for distance and years for time,
c disappears.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Any constant with diumension can be transformed away by using suitable dimensions. For instance, if light years are used for distance and years for time,
c disappears.
But surely we can't just "transform away" something like Heisenberg Uncertainty. I'm still missing something incredibly simple here.
 
The HUP comes from Fourier analysis where \Delta k \Delta x>1/2.
It is only when you want to talk in terms of momentum rather than k that hbar
enters.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top